Investigating Misinformation in Online Marketplaces: An Audit Study on Amazon
Search and recommendation systems are ubiquitous and irreplaceable tools in our daily lives. Despite their critical role in selecting and ranking the most relevant information, they typically do not consider the veracity of information presented to the user. In this paper, we introduce an audit methodology to investigate the extent of misinformation presented in search results and recommendations on online marketplaces. We investigate the factors and personalization attributes that influence the amount of misinformation in searches and recommendations. Recently, several media reports criticized Amazon for hosting and recommending items that promote misinformation on topics such as vaccines. Motivated by those reports, we apply our algorithmic auditing methodology on Amazon to verify those claims. Our audit study investigates (a) factors that might influence the search algorithms of Amazon and (b) personalization attributes that contribute to amplifying the amount of misinformation recommended to users in their search results and recommendations. Our audit study collected ~526k search results and ~182k homepage recommendations, with ~8.5k unique items. Each item is annotated for its stance on vaccines' misinformation (pro, neutral, or anti). Our study reveals that (1) the selection and ranking by the default Featured search algorithm of search results that have misinformation stances are positively correlated with the stance of search queries and customers' evaluation of items (ratings and reviews), (2) misinformation stances of search results are neither affected by users' activities nor by interacting (browsing, wish-listing, shopping) with items that have a misinformation stance, and (3) a filter bubble built-in users' homepages have a misinformation stance positively correlated with the misinformation stance of items that a user interacts with.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
MisinformationRecommendation SystemsSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Auditing YouTube's Recommendation Algorithm for Misinformation Filter Bubbles
In this paper, we present results of an auditing study performed over YouTube aimed at investigating how fast a user can get into a misinformation filter bubble, but also what it takes to "burst the bubble", i.e., revert…
MisinformationMarketplace for AI Models
Artificial intelligence shows promise for solving many practical societal problems in areas such as healthcare and transportation. However, the current mechanisms for AI model diffusion such as Github code repositories, …
Algorithmic Behaviors Across Regions: A Geolocation Audit of YouTube Search for COVID-19 Misinformation Between the United States and South Africa
Despite being an integral tool for finding health-related information online, YouTube has faced criticism for disseminating COVID-19 misinformation globally to its users. Yet, prior audit studies have predominantly inves…
MisinformationWhen the Umpire is also a Player: Bias in Private Label Product Recommendations on E-commerce Marketplaces
Algorithmic recommendations mediate interactions between millions of customers and products (in turn, their producers and sellers) on large e-commerce marketplaces like Amazon. In recent years, the producers and sellers …
FairnessTowards Combating Pandemic-related Misinformation in Social Media
Conventional preventive measures during pandemic include social distancing and lockdown. Such measures in the time of social media brought about a new set of challenges - vulnerability to the toxic impact of online misin…
Misinformation