Is PGD-Adversarial Training Necessary? Alternative Training via a Soft-Quantization Network with Noisy-Natural Samples Only
Recent work on adversarial attack and defense suggests that PGD is a universal $l_\infty$ first-order attack, and PGD adversarial training can significantly improve network robustness against a wide range of first-order $l_\infty$-bounded attacks, represented as the state-of-the-art defense method. However, an obvious weakness of PGD adversarial training is its highly-computational cost in generating adversarial samples, making it computationally infeasible for large and high-resolution real datasets such as the ImageNet dataset. In addition, recent work also has suggested a simple "close-form" solution to a robust model on MNIST. Therefore, a natural question raised is that is PGD adversarial training really necessary for robust defense? In this paper, we give a negative answer by proposing a training paradigm that is comparable to PGD adversarial training on several standard datasets, while only using noisy-natural samples. Specifically, we reformulate the min-max objective in PGD adversarial training by a problem to minimize the original network loss plus $l_1$ norms of its gradients w.r.t. the inputs. For the $l_1$-norm loss, we propose a computationally-feasible solution by embedding a differentiable soft-quantization layer after the network input layer. We show formally that the soft-quantization layer trained with noisy-natural samples is an alternative approach to minimizing the $l_1$-gradient norms as in PGD adversarial training. Extensive empirical evaluations on standard datasets show that our proposed models are comparable to PGD-adversarially-trained models under PGD and BPDA attacks. Remarkably, our method achieves a 24X speed-up on MNIST while maintaining a comparable defensive ability, and for the first time fine-tunes a robust Imagenet model within only two days. Code is provided on \url{https://github.com/tianzheng4/Noisy-Training-Soft-Quantization}
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Adversarial AttackQuantizationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Guiding the retraining of convolutional neural networks against adversarial inputs
Background: When using deep learning models, there are many possible vulnerabilities and some of the most worrying are the adversarial inputs, which can cause wrong decisions with minor perturbations. Therefore, it becom…
image-classificationImage Classificationsoftware testingEnhancing Classifier Conservativeness and Robustness by Polynomiality
We illustrate the detrimental effect, such as overconfident decisions, that exponential behavior can have in methods like classical LDA and logistic regression. We then show how polynomiality can remedy the situation. Th…
regressionGenerative Robust Classification
Training adversarially robust discriminative (i.e., softmax) classifier has been the dominant approach to robust classification. Building on recent work on adversarial training (AT)-based generative models, we investigat…
ClassificationData AugmentationRobust classificationA survey on text generation using generative adversarial networks
This work presents a thorough review concerning recent studies and text generation advancements using Generative Adversarial Networks. The usage of adversarial learning for text generation is promising as it provides alt…
Adversarial TextSurveyText GenerationThe divergences minimized by non-saturating GANs
Interpreting generative adversarial network (GAN) training as approximate divergence minimization has been theoretically insightful, has spurred discussion, and has lead to theoretically and practically interesting exten…
Generative Adversarial Network