paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Is Surprisal in Issue Trackers Actionable?

2022-04-15 · James Caddy, Markus Wagner, Christoph Treude, Earl T. Barr, Miltiadis Allamanis

Background. From information theory, surprisal is a measurement of how unexpected an event is. Statistical language models provide a probabilistic approximation of natural languages, and because surprisal is constructed with the probability of an event occuring, it is therefore possible to determine the surprisal associated with English sentences. The issues and pull requests of software repository issue trackers give insight into the development process and likely contain the surprising events of this process. Objective. Prior works have identified that unusual events in software repositories are of interest to developers, and use simple code metrics-based methods for detecting them. In this study we will propose a new method for unusual event detection in software repositories using surprisal. With the ability to find surprising issues and pull requests, we intend to further analyse them to determine if they actually hold importance in a repository, or if they pose a significant challenge to address. If it is possible to find bad surprises early, or before they cause additional troubles, it is plausible that effort, cost and time will be saved as a result. Method. After extracting the issues and pull requests from 5000 of the most popular software repositories on GitHub, we will train a language model to represent these issues. We will measure their perceived importance in the repository, measure their resolution difficulty using several analogues, measure the surprisal of each, and finally generate inferential statistics to describe any correlations.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2204.07363

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Event DetectionLanguage Modelling

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Words, Subwords, and Morphemes: What Really Matters in the Surprisal-Reading Time Relationship?

2023-10-26 · Sathvik Nair, Philip Resnik

An important assumption that comes with using LLMs on psycholinguistic data has gone unverified. LLM-based predictions are based on subword tokenization, not decomposition of words into morphemes. Does that matter? We ca…

On the Proper Treatment of Tokenization in Psycholinguistics

2024-10-03 · Mario Giulianelli, Luca Malagutti, Juan Luis Gastaldi, Brian DuSell 외

Language models are widely used in computational psycholinguistics to test theories that relate the negative log probability (the surprisal) of a region of interest (a substring of characters) under a language model to i…

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

Towards a Similarity-adjusted Surprisal Theory

2024-10-23 · Clara Meister, Mario Giulianelli, Tiago Pimentel

Surprisal theory posits that the cognitive effort required to comprehend a word is determined by its contextual predictability, quantified as surprisal. Traditionally, surprisal theory treats words as distinct entities, …

Diversity

Addressing surprisal deficiencies in reading time models

2016-12-01 · WS 2016 12 · Marten van Schijndel, William Schuler

This study demonstrates a weakness in how n-gram and PCFG surprisal are used to predict reading times in eye-tracking data. In particular, the information conveyed by words skipped during saccades is not usually included…

The Frequency Confound in Language-Model Surprisal and Metaphor Novelty

2026-05-07 · Omar Momen, Sina Zarrieß arxiv

Language-model (LM) surprisal is widely used as a proxy for contextual predictability and has been reported to correlate with metaphor novelty judgments. However, surprisal is tightly intertwined with lexical frequency. …