paper-with-me

Papers

ITL: Interpretable Document Alignment with Structured Reference Frameworks

2026-08-27 · Raúl Giráldez, Dayrelis Mena, Jesús S. Aguilar--Ruiz arxiv

Measuring alignment between documents and structured reference frameworks requires identifying conceptual evidence distributed throughout the text and reporting it through measures that are quantitative, interpretable, and traceable. Many commonly used retrieval and classification approaches return either pairwise similarity scores or one or more class labels, whereas fewer methods provide concept-level scores that are directly traceable to the terminological evidence supporting them. We present \emph{Intelligent Target Locator} (ITL), a domain-agnostic and language-portable methodology that estimates the affinity between the textual units of a target document and the concepts defined in a \emph{Structured Reference Document} ($SRD$). From the $SRD$, ITL induces concept-specific terminological profiles built from independent terms, bigrams, trigrams, and co-occurrences. Each term is assigned an importance weight that combines concept membership, term-type specificity and inter-concept discriminability. The output is a textual-unit--concept affinity matrix that can be aggregated at different levels of granularity. We conduct an internal consistency assessment using the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), evaluating each official goal statement against the $SRD$ induced from the same set of descriptors. Every statement reached its highest affinity with the corresponding concept, and the mean affinity across the remaining concepts stayed marginal relative to the mean reference affinity. This separation indicates that ITL distinguishes the conceptual profiles of the framework. ITL thus offers a general basis for quantifying document alignment with structured frameworks while keeping each result traceable to the terminological evidence that supports it.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2608.27031

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Interpretable Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Tree-Structured Reward Functions

2021-12-20 · Tom Bewley, Freddy Lecue

The potential of reinforcement learning (RL) to deliver aligned and performant agents is partially bottlenecked by the reward engineering problem. One alternative to heuristic trial-and-error is preference-based RL (PbRL…

reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

Eval Factsheets: A Structured Framework for Documenting AI Evaluations

2025-12-03 · Florian Bordes, Candace Ross, Justine T Kao, Evangelia Spiliopoulou 외 arxiv

The rapid proliferation of benchmarks has created significant challenges in reproducibility, transparency, and informed decision-making. However, unlike datasets and models -- which benefit from structured documentation …

Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents

2026-04-20 · Akriti Jain, Anish Mulay, Divyansh Verma, Aishani Pandey 외 arxiv

Decision-making is a cognitively intensive task that requires synthesizing relevant information from multiple unstructured sources, weighing competing factors, and incorporating subjective user preferences. Existing meth…

Alignment and Safety of Diffusion Models via Reinforcement Learning and Reward Modeling: A Survey

2025-05-23 · Preeti Lamba, Kiran Ravish, Ankita Kushwaha, Pawan Kumar

Diffusion models have emerged as leading generative models for images and other modalities, but aligning their outputs with human preferences and safety constraints remains a critical challenge. This thesis proposal inve…

Active LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)Safety Alignment

WikiPersonas: What Can We Learn From Personalized Alignment to Famous People?

2025-05-19 · Zilu Tang, Afra Feyza Akyürek, Ekin Akyürek, Derry Wijaya

Preference alignment has become a standard pipeline in finetuning models to follow \emph{generic} human preferences. Majority of work seeks to optimize model to produce responses that would be preferable \emph{on average…