paper-with-me

Papers

Large language models require a new form of oversight: capability-based monitoring

2025-11-05 · Katherine C. Kellogg, Bingyang Ye, Yifan Hu, Guergana K. Savova, Byron Wallace, Danielle S. Bitterman arxiv

The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has been accompanied by scrutiny of their oversight. Existing monitoring approaches, inherited from traditional machine learning (ML), are task-based and founded on assumed performance degradation arising from dataset drift. In contrast, with LLMs, inevitable model degradation due to changes in populations compared to the training dataset cannot be assumed, because LLMs were not trained for any specific task in any given population. We therefore propose a new organizing principle guiding generalist LLM monitoring that is scalable and grounded in how these models are developed and used in practice: capability-based monitoring. Capability-based monitoring is motivated by the fact that LLMs are generalist systems whose overlapping internal capabilities are reused across numerous downstream tasks. Instead of evaluating each downstream task independently, this approach organizes monitoring around shared model capabilities, such as summarization, reasoning, translation, or safety guardrails, in order to enable cross-task detection of systemic weaknesses, long-tail errors, and emergent behaviors that task-based monitoring may miss. We describe considerations for developers, organizational leaders, and professional societies for implementing a capability-based monitoring approach. Ultimately, capability-based monitoring will provide a scalable foundation for safe, adaptive, and collaborative monitoring of LLMs and future generalist artificial intelligence models in healthcare.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2511.03106

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

AI Act and Large Language Models (LLMs): When critical issues and privacy impact require human and ethical oversight

2024-03-31 · Nicola Fabiano

The imposing evolution of artificial intelligence systems and, specifically, of Large Language Models (LLM) makes it necessary to carry out assessments of their level of risk and the impact they may have in the area of p…

Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Capability-Accountability Trap

2026-02-10 · Nicholas Caputo arxiv

Since 1887, administrative law has navigated a "capability-accountability trap": technological change forces government to become more sophisticated, but sophistication renders agencies opaque to generalist overseers lik…

Scaling Laws For Scalable Oversight

2025-04-25 · Joshua Engels, David D. Baek, Subhash Kantamneni, Max Tegmark

Scalable oversight, the process by which weaker AI systems supervise stronger ones, has been proposed as a key strategy to control future superintelligent systems. However, it is still unclear how scalable oversight itse…

Chatbot

The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignment

2024-12-21 · HyunJin Kim, Xiaoyuan Yi, Jing Yao, Jianxun Lian 외

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has sparked the possibility of about Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), a hypothetical AI system surpassing human intelligence. However, existing alignment paradigms struggl…

Survey

Position: Human-Centric AI Requires a Minimum Viable Level of Human Understanding

2026-01-31 · Fangzhou Lin, Qianwen Ge, Lingyu Xu, Peiran Li 외 arxiv

AI systems increasingly produce fluent, correct, end-to-end outcomes. Over time, this erodes users' ability to explain, verify, or intervene. We define this divergence as the Capability-Comprehension Gap: a decoupling wh…