paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results

2024-03-04 · Xiaoliang Luo, Akilles Rechardt, Guangzhi Sun, Kevin K. Nejad, Felipe Yáñez, Bati Yilmaz, Kangjoo Lee, Alexandra O. Cohen, Valentina Borghesani, Anton Pashkov, Daniele Marinazzo, Jonathan Nicholas, Alessandro Salatiello, Ilia Sucholutsky, Pasquale Minervini, Sepehr Razavi, Roberta Rocca, Elkhan Yusifov, Tereza Okalova, Nianlong Gu, Martin Ferianc, Mikail Khona, Kaustubh R. Patil, Pui-Shee Lee, Rui Mata, Nicholas E. Myers, Jennifer K Bizley, Sebastian Musslick, Isil Poyraz Bilgin, Guiomar Niso, Justin M. Ales, Michael Gaebler, N Apurva Ratan Murty, Leyla Loued-Khenissi, Anna Behler, Chloe M. Hall, Jessica Dafflon, Sherry Dongqi Bao, Bradley C. Love

Scientific discoveries often hinge on synthesizing decades of research, a task that potentially outstrips human information processing capacities. Large language models (LLMs) offer a solution. LLMs trained on the vast scientific literature could potentially integrate noisy yet interrelated findings to forecast novel results better than human experts. To evaluate this possibility, we created BrainBench, a forward-looking benchmark for predicting neuroscience results. We find that LLMs surpass experts in predicting experimental outcomes. BrainGPT, an LLM we tuned on the neuroscience literature, performed better yet. Like human experts, when LLMs were confident in their predictions, they were more likely to be correct, which presages a future where humans and LLMs team together to make discoveries. Our approach is not neuroscience-specific and is transferable to other knowledge-intensive endeavors.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2403.03230

Code (1)

braingpt-lovelab/brainbench 공식 구현

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Forecasting Against Expert Forecasters

2025-07-06 · Janna Lu arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, but their ability to forecast future events remains understudied. A year ago, large language models struggle to come close to t…

Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers

2024-02-09 · Akbir Khan, John Hughes, Dan Valentine, Laura Ruis 외

Common methods for aligning large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviour heavily rely on human-labelled data. However, as models grow increasingly sophisticated, they will surpass human expertise, and the role of …

Persuasiveness

Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge

2025-07-15 · Wenqing Wu, Chengzhi Zhang, Yi Zhao arxiv

Novelty is a crucial criterion in the peer review process for evaluating academic papers. Traditionally, it's judged by experts or measure by unique reference combinations. Both methods have limitations: experts have lim…

EnsemW2S: Enhancing Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Large Language Model Ensembles

2025-05-28 · Aakriti Agrawal, Mucong Ding, Zora Che, ChengHao Deng 외

With Large Language Models (LLMs) rapidly approaching and potentially surpassing human-level performance, it has become imperative to develop approaches capable of effectively supervising and enhancing these powerful mod…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model

Predicting Empirical AI Research Outcomes with Language Models

2025-06-01 · Jiaxin Wen, Chenglei Si, Yueh-han Chen, He He 외

Many promising-looking ideas in AI research fail to deliver, but their validation takes substantial human labor and compute. Predicting an idea's chance of success is thus crucial for accelerating empirical AI research, …

Retrieval