paper-with-me

Papers

Learnability with PAC Semantics for Multi-agent Beliefs

2023-06-08 · Ionela G. Mocanu, Vaishak Belle, Brendan Juba

The tension between deduction and induction is perhaps the most fundamental issue in areas such as philosophy, cognition and artificial intelligence. In an influential paper, Valiant recognised that the challenge of learning should be integrated with deduction. In particular, he proposed a semantics to capture the quality possessed by the output of Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning algorithms when formulated in a logic. Although weaker than classical entailment, it allows for a powerful model-theoretic framework for answering queries. In this paper, we provide a new technical foundation to demonstrate PAC learning with multi-agent epistemic logics. To circumvent the negative results in the literature on the difficulty of robust learning with the PAC semantics, we consider so-called implicit learning where we are able to incorporate observations to the background theory in service of deciding the entailment of an epistemic query. We prove correctness of the learning procedure and discuss results on the sample complexity, that is how many observations we will need to provably assert that the query is entailed given a user-specified error bound. Finally, we investigate under what circumstances this algorithm can be made efficient. On the last point, given that reasoning in epistemic logics especially in multi-agent epistemic logics is PSPACE-complete, it might seem like there is no hope for this problem. We leverage some recent results on the so-called Representation Theorem explored for single-agent and multi-agent epistemic logics with the only knowing operator to reduce modal reasoning to propositional reasoning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2306.05490

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

PAC learningPhilosophy

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Golden Queue Managers 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Grounding Language about Belief in a Bayesian Theory-of-Mind

2024-02-16 · Lance Ying, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Lionel Wong, Vikash Mansinghka 외

Despite the fact that beliefs are mental states that cannot be directly observed, humans talk about each others' beliefs on a regular basis, often using rich compositional language to describe what others think and know.…

Attribute

A logic for reasoning about ambiguity

2014-01-09 · Joseph Y. Halpern, Willemien Kets

Standard models of multi-agent modal logic do not capture the fact that information is often \emph{ambiguous}, and may be interpreted in different ways by different agents. We propose a framework that can model this, and…

Argument-based Belief in Topological Structures

2017-07-27 · Chenwei Shi, Sonja Smets, Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada

This paper combines two studies: a topological semantics for epistemic notions and abstract argumentation theory. In our combined setting, we use a topological semantics to represent the structure of an agent's collectio…

Abstract Argumentation

An Action Language for Multi-Agent Domains: Foundations

2015-11-06 · Chitta Baral, Gregory Gelfond, Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son

In multi-agent domains (MADs), an agent's action may not just change the world and the agent's knowledge and beliefs about the world, but also may change other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world and their know…

Switching to Learn

2015-03-11 · Shahin Shahrampour, Mohammad Amin Rahimian, Ali Jadbabaie

A network of agents attempt to learn some unknown state of the world drawn by nature from a finite set. Agents observe private signals conditioned on the true state, and form beliefs about the unknown state accordingly. …