paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Learning-Based Automated Adversarial Red-Teaming for Robustness Evaluation of Large Language Models

2025-12-21 · Zhang Wei, Hanxuan Chen, Peilu Hu, Zhenyuan Wei, Chenwei Liang, Jiayi Gu, Wenqian Wang, Jacqueline Pang, Hao Yan, Li Mei, Shengning Lang, Kuan Lu, Xi Xiao, Zhimo Han, Yijin Wang, Yichao Zhang, Chen Yang, Zhenyu Yu, Riyang Bao, Xinyuan Song, Junfeng Hao, Mu-Jiang-Shan Wang arxiv

Red-teaming is becoming a central part of large language model (LLM) safety evaluation, yet current practice still relies heavily on expert-written prompts or fixed benchmark suites. This creates a gap between what is easy to test and what deployed models can actually do: failures may be rare, context-sensitive, and distributed across many threat categories. We study automated red-teaming as a constrained adversarial search problem and introduce a learning-driven framework that couples category-aware attack generation with hierarchical vulnerability detection. The method starts from curated safety seeds, expands them through meta-prompt-guided and evolutionary search, and scores the resulting prompt--response pairs with lexical, semantic, and behavioral detectors. Across six threat categories on GPT-OSS-20B, the framework discovers 47 validated vulnerabilities, including 21 high-severity cases and 12 novel attack patterns. Under matched query budgets, it achieves a 3.9$\times$ higher discovery rate than manual expert red-teaming while maintaining 89\% detection accuracy and full category coverage. Ablations show that the gains do not come from more prompts alone: diversity constraints prevent template collapse, coverage constraints prevent category blind spots, and semantic detection recovers failures missed by lexical rules. These results suggest that red-teaming can be made more scalable and reproducible when treated as adaptive search rather than as a static checklist.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.20677

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Vulnerability Detection

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal

2024-02-06 · Mantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou 외

Automated red teaming holds substantial promise for uncovering and mitigating the risks associated with the malicious use of large language models (LLMs), yet the field lacks a standardized evaluation framework to rigoro…

Red Teaming

ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models

2023-10-14 · Alex Mei, Sharon Levy, William Yang Wang

As large language models are integrated into society, robustness toward a suite of prompts is increasingly important to maintain reliability in a high-variance environment.Robustness evaluations must comprehensively enca…

Red Teaming

Ferret: Faster and Effective Automated Red Teaming with Reward-Based Scoring Technique

2024-08-20 · Tej Deep Pala, Vernon Y. H. Toh, Rishabh Bhardwaj, Soujanya Poria

In today's era, where large language models (LLMs) are integrated into numerous real-world applications, ensuring their safety and robustness is crucial for responsible AI usage. Automated red-teaming methods play a key …

AI and SafetyDiversityRed TeamingSafety Alignment

GPT-Red: Automated Red Teaming via Self-Play at Scale

2026-07-28 · Eric Wallace, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Nikhil Kandpal, Sam Toyer 외 hf

We introduce GPT-Red, an automated red-teaming agent that is trained to discover novel prompt injection attacks against frontier LLMs. The goal of this model is to evaluate and improve the robustness of our production sy…

Red Teaming

AART: AI-Assisted Red-Teaming with Diverse Data Generation for New LLM-powered Applications

2023-11-14 · Bhaktipriya Radharapu, Kevin Robinson, Lora Aroyo, Preethi Lahoti

Adversarial testing of large language models (LLMs) is crucial for their safe and responsible deployment. We introduce a novel approach for automated generation of adversarial evaluation datasets to test the safety of LL…

DiversityRed Teaming