Learning Fine-grained Fact-Article Correspondence in Legal Cases
Automatically recommending relevant law articles to a given legal case has attracted much attention as it can greatly release human labor from searching over the large database of laws. However, current researches only support coarse-grained recommendation where all relevant articles are predicted as a whole without explaining which specific fact each article is relevant with. Since one case can be formed of many supporting facts, traversing over them to verify the correctness of recommendation results can be time-consuming. We believe that learning fine-grained correspondence between each single fact and law articles is crucial for an accurate and trustworthy AI system. With this motivation, we perform a pioneering study and create a corpus with manually annotated fact-article correspondences. We treat the learning as a text matching task and propose a multi-level matching network to address it. To help the model better digest the content of law articles, we parse articles in form of premise-conclusion pairs with random forest. Experiments show that the parsed form yielded better performance and the resulting model surpassed other popular text matching baselines. Furthermore, we compare with previous researches and find that establishing the fine-grained fact-article correspondences can improve the recommendation accuracy by a large margin. Our best system reaches an F1 score of 96.3%, making it of great potential for practical use. It can also significantly boost the downstream task of legal decision prediction, increasing the F1 score by up to 12.7%.
Code (1)
Tasks
ArticlesText MatchingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
CDJUR-BR -- A Golden Collection of Legal Document from Brazilian Justice with Fine-Grained Named Entities
A basic task for most Legal Artificial Intelligence (Legal AI) applications is Named Entity Recognition (NER). However, texts produced in the context of legal practice make references to entities that are not trivially r…
AttributeJurisprudencenamed-entity-recognitionNamed Entity Recognition+2CaseEncoder: A Knowledge-enhanced Pre-trained Model for Legal Case Encoding
Legal case retrieval is a critical process for modern legal information systems. While recent studies have utilized pre-trained language models (PLMs) based on the general domain self-supervised pre-training paradigm to …
RetrievalUniversal Legal Article Prediction via Tight Collaboration between Supervised Classification Model and LLM
Legal Article Prediction (LAP) is a critical task in legal text classification, leveraging natural language processing (NLP) techniques to automatically predict relevant legal articles based on the fact descriptions of c…
Text ClassificationPLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to legal domain-specific tasks, evaluating their ability to perform legal work in real-world settings has become essential. However, existing legal benchmarks rely…
Legal ReasoningExploiting Domain-Specific Knowledge for Judgment Prediction Is No Panacea
Legal judgment prediction (LJP) usually consists in a text classification task aimed at predicting the verdict on the basis of the fact description. The literature shows that the use of articles as input features helps i…
ArticlesLegal Reasoningtext-classificationText Classification