Learning (Predictive) Risk Scores in the Presence of Censoring due to Interventions
A large and diverse set of measurements are regularly collected during a patient's hospital stay to monitor their health status. Tools for integrating these measurements into severity scores, that accurately track changes in illness severity, can improve clinicians ability to provide timely interventions. Existing approaches for creating such scores either 1) rely on experts to fully specify the severity score, or 2) train a predictive score, using supervised learning, by regressing against a surrogate marker of severity such as the presence of downstream adverse events. The first approach does not extend to diseases where an accurate score cannot be elicited from experts. The second approach often produces scores that suffer from bias due to treatment-related censoring (Paxton, 2013). We propose a novel ranking based framework for disease severity score learning (DSSL). DSSL exploits the following key observation: while it is challenging for experts to quantify the disease severity at any given time, it is often easy to compare the disease severity at two different times. Extending existing ranking algorithms, DSSL learns a function that maps a vector of patient's measurements to a scalar severity score such that the resulting score is temporally smooth and consistent with the expert's ranking of pairs of disease states. We apply DSSL to the problem of learning a sepsis severity score using a large, real-world dataset. The learned scores significantly outperform state-of-the-art clinical scores in ranking patient states by severity and in early detection of future adverse events. We also show that the learned disease severity trajectories are consistent with clinical expectations of disease evolution. Further, using simulated datasets, we show that DSSL exhibits better generalization performance to changes in treatment patterns compared to the above approaches.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Proper Scoring Rules for Right-Censored Survival Data
Proper scoring rules provide a rigorous theoretical basis for the training and evaluation of probabilistic forecasts. However, in the presence of right censoring, the event time is only partially observed, rendering conv…
Holdouts set for safe predictive model updating
Predictive risk scores for adverse outcomes are increasingly crucial in guiding health interventions. Such scores may need to be periodically updated due to change in the distributions they model. However, directly updat…
Holdout SetmodelComparison of static and dynamic random forests models for EHR data in the presence of competing risks: predicting central line-associated bloodstream infection
Prognostic outcomes related to hospital admissions typically do not suffer from censoring, and can be modeled either categorically or as time-to-event. Competing events are common but often ignored. We compared the perfo…
Towards end-to-end LLM-based censoring-aware survival analysis
Objective: Survival analysis is central to medical prediction, yet large language models (LLMs) are rarely used as end-to-end survival models because censoring prevents straightforward supervised fine-tuning. Here we pre…
ICU MortalityDeep Survival Machines: Fully Parametric Survival Regression and Representation Learning for Censored Data with Competing Risks
We describe a new approach to estimating relative risks in time-to-event prediction problems with censored data in a fully parametric manner. Our approach does not require making strong assumptions of constant proportion…
Representation LearningSurvival AnalysisTime-to-Event Prediction