Learning to Communicate Using Counterfactual Reasoning
Learning to communicate in order to share state information is an active problem in the area of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). The credit assignment problem, the non-stationarity of the communication environment and the creation of influenceable agents are major challenges within this research field which need to be overcome in order to learn a valid communication protocol. This paper introduces the novel multi-agent counterfactual communication learning (MACC) method which adapts counterfactual reasoning in order to overcome the credit assignment problem for communicating agents. Secondly, the non-stationarity of the communication environment while learning the communication Q-function is overcome by creating the communication Q-function using the action policy of the other agents and the Q-function of the action environment. Additionally, a social loss function is introduced in order to create influenceable agents which is required to learn a valid communication protocol. Our experiments show that MACC is able to outperform the state-of-the-art baselines in four different scenarios in the Particle environment.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningMulti-agent Reinforcement LearningvalidSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Prompt Engineering a Prompt Engineer
Prompt engineering is a challenging yet crucial task for optimizing the performance of large language models on customized tasks. It requires complex reasoning to examine the model's errors, hypothesize what is missing o…
counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningGSM8KPrompt EngineeringCounterBench: A Benchmark for Counterfactuals Reasoning in Large Language Models
Counterfactual reasoning is widely recognized as one of the most challenging and intricate aspects of causality in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in co…
Commonsense Causal ReasoningcounterfactualCounterfactual InferenceCounterfactual ReasoningGenerating Counterfactual and Contrastive Explanations using SHAP
With the advent of GDPR, the domain of explainable AI and model interpretability has gained added impetus. Methods to extract and communicate visibility into decision-making models have become legal requirement. Two spec…
counterfactualDecision MakingOn the Complexity of Counterfactual Reasoning
We study the computational complexity of counterfactual reasoning in relation to the complexity of associational and interventional reasoning on structural causal models (SCMs). We show that counterfactual reasoning is n…
counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningCounterfactual Collaborative Reasoning
Causal reasoning and logical reasoning are two important types of reasoning abilities for human intelligence. However, their relationship has not been extensively explored under machine intelligence context. In this pape…
counterfactualCounterfactual ReasoningData AugmentationLogical Reasoning+1