paper-with-me

Papers

Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance

2025-04-21 · Jianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Zican Hu, Zhi Wang, Ganqu Cui, Xiaoye Qu, Yu Cheng, Yue Zhang

Recent advances in large reasoning models (LRMs) demonstrate that sophisticated behaviors such as multi-step reasoning and self-reflection can emerge via reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards~(\textit{RLVR}). However, existing \textit{RLVR} approaches are inherently ``on-policy'', limiting learning to a model's own outputs and failing to acquire reasoning abilities beyond its initial capabilities. To address this issue, we introduce \textbf{LUFFY} (\textbf{L}earning to reason \textbf{U}nder o\textbf{FF}-polic\textbf{Y} guidance), a framework that augments \textit{RLVR} with off-policy reasoning traces. LUFFY dynamically balances imitation and exploration by combining off-policy demonstrations with on-policy rollouts during training. Specifically, LUFFY combines the Mixed-Policy GRPO framework, which has a theoretically guaranteed convergence rate, alongside policy shaping via regularized importance sampling to avoid superficial and rigid imitation during mixed-policy training. Compared with previous RLVR methods, LUFFY achieves an over \textbf{+6.4} average gain across six math benchmarks and an advantage of over \textbf{+6.2} points in out-of-distribution tasks. Most significantly, we show that LUFFY successfully trains weak models in scenarios where on-policy RLVR completely fails. These results provide compelling evidence that LUFFY transcends the fundamental limitations of on-policy RLVR and demonstrates the great potential of utilizing off-policy guidance in RLVR.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.14945

Code (1)

elliottyan/luffy 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

MathReinforcement Learning (RL)

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

SocraticPO: Policy Optimization via Interactive Guidance

2026-06-03 · Zirui Liu, Jie Ouyang, Qi Liu, Xianquan Wang 외 arxiv

Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models usually supervises reasoning with scalar outcome rewards, such as binary correctness. Such rewards provide an optimization direction but rarely explain how a model sh…

Reinforcement Learning

AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

2026-05-08 · Junnan Liu, Linhao Luo, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari arxiv

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, largely stimulated by Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). However, existing RL algorithms face a fun…

Reinforcement Learning

Teaching the Way, Not the Answer: Privileged Tutoring Distillation for Multimodal Policy Optimization

2026-06-05 · Shizhe Xiang, Ke An, Wenlong Yu, Yue Liu 외 arxiv

Recent post-training methods, particularly Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), have significantly enhanced the reasoning ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, the sparse nature of v…

Reinforcement LearningMultimodal Reasoning

More Than One Teacher: Adaptive Multi-Guidance Policy Optimization for Diverse Exploration

2025-10-02 · Xiaoyang Yuan, Yujuan Ding, Yi Bin, Wenqi Shao 외 arxiv

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a promising paradigm for enhancing the reasoning ability in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, prevailing methods primarily rely on self-exploration or a singl…

Reinforcement LearningKnowledge DistillationMathematical Reasoning

FlowBalance: Verifier-Grounded Self-Improvement from On-Policy Reasoning Experience

2026-09-03 · Zixun Huang, Kishan Panaganti, Haitao Mi, Leowei Liang hf

A reasoning model can improve from its own on-policy experience, but this inner loop is fragile: terminal verifiers provide reliable yet sparse supervision, while dense same-model guidance can reinforce false confidence …

Mathematical Reasoning