Least Square Calibration for Peer Reviews
Peer review systems such as conference paper review often suffer from the issue of miscalibration. Previous works on peer review calibration usually only use the ordinal information or assume simplistic reviewer scoring functions such as linear functions. In practice, applications like academic conferences often rely on manual methods, such as open discussions, to mitigate miscalibration. It remains an important question to develop algorithms that can handle different types of miscalibrations based on available prior knowledge. In this paper, we propose a flexible framework, namely \emph{least square calibration} (LSC), for selecting top candidates from peer ratings. Our framework provably performs perfect calibration from noiseless linear scoring functions under mild assumptions, yet also provides competitive calibration results when the scoring function is from broader classes beyond linear functions and with arbitrary noise. On our synthetic dataset, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithm consistently outperforms the baseline which select top papers based on the highest average ratings.
Code (1)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Least Square Calibration for Peer Review
Peer review systems such as conference paper review often suffer from the issue of miscalibration. Previous works on peer review calibration usually only use the ordinal information or assume simplistic reviewer scoring …
Compare different SG-Schemes based on large least square problems
This study reviews some of the popular stochastic gradient-based schemes based on large least-square problems. These schemes, often called optimizers in machine learning play a crucial role in finding better parameters o…
How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?
How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,000 submitting authors and 9,000 submitt…
PeerSum: A Peer Review Dataset for Abstractive Multi-document Summarization
We present PeerSum, a new MDS dataset using peer reviews of scientific publications. Our dataset differs from the existing MDS datasets in that our summaries (i.e., the meta-reviews) are highly abstractive and they are r…
Document SummarizationMulti-Document SummarizationPeerSum: A Peer Review Dataset for Abstractive Multi-document Summarization
We present PeerSum, a new MDS dataset using peer reviews of scientific publications. Our dataset differs from the existing MDS datasets in that our summaries (i.e., the meta-reviews) are highly abstractive and they are r…
Document SummarizationMulti-Document Summarization