LegalBench-BR: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Brazilian Legal Decision Classification
We introduce LegalBench-BR, the first public benchmark for evaluating language models on Brazilian legal text classification. The dataset comprises 3,105 appellate proceedings from the Santa Catarina State Court (TJSC), collected via the DataJud API (CNJ) and annotated across five legal areas through LLM-assisted labeling with heuristic validation. On a class-balanced test set, BERTimbau-LoRA, updating only 0.3% of model parameters, achieves 87.6% accuracy and 0.87 macro-F1 (+22pp over Claude 3.5 Haiku, +28pp over GPT-4o mini). The gap is most striking on administrativo (administrative law): GPT-4o mini scores F1 = 0.00 and Claude 3.5 Haiku scores F1 = 0.08 on this class, while the fine-tuned model reaches F1 = 0.91. Both commercial LLMs exhibit a systematic bias toward civel (civil law), absorbing ambiguous classes rather than discriminating them, a failure mode that domain-adapted fine-tuning eliminates. These results demonstrate that general-purpose LLMs cannot substitute for domain-adapted models in Brazilian legal classification, even when the task is a simple 5-class problem, and that LoRA fine-tuning on a consumer GPU closes the gap at zero marginal inference cost. We release the full dataset, model, and pipeline to enable reproducible research in Portuguese legal NLP.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Text ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are showing promising potential, and are becoming increasingly relevant in AI-powered legal applications. Existing benchmarks, such as LegalBench, assess the generative capabi…
RAGRetrievalRetrieval-augmented GenerationLegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
The advent of large language models (LLMs) and their adoption by the legal community has given rise to the question: what types of legal reasoning can LLMs perform? To enable greater study of this question, we present Le…
Legal ReasoningTW-LegalBench: Measuring Taiwanese Legal Understanding
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across diverse tasks, yet their performance on jurisdiction-specific legal reasoning remains underexplored. We present TW-LegalBench that utilizes Taiwanese…
Text GenerationLegal ReasoningIslamicLegalBench: Evaluating LLMs Knowledge and Reasoning of Islamic Law Across 1,200 Years of Islamic Pluralist Legal Traditions
As millions of Muslims turn to LLMs like GPT, Claude, and DeepSeek for religious guidance, a critical question arises: Can these AI systems reliably reason about Islamic law? We introduce IslamicLegalBench, the first ben…
Legal ReasoningLegalBench.PT: A Benchmark for Portuguese Law
The recent application of LLMs to the legal field has spurred the creation of benchmarks across various jurisdictions and languages. However, no benchmark has yet been specifically designed for the Portuguese legal syste…
Multiple-choice