paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

LieCraft: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating Deceptive Capabilities in Language Models

2026-03-06 · Matthew Lyle Olson, Neale Ratzlaff, Musashi Hinck, Tri Nguyen, Vasudev Lal, Joseph Campbell, Simon Stepputtis, Shao-Yen Tseng arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive general-purpose capabilities but also introduce serious safety risks, particularly the potential for deception as models acquire increased agency and human oversight diminishes. In this work, we present LieCraft: a novel evaluation framework and sandbox for measuring LLM deception that addresses key limitations of prior game-based evaluations. At its core, LieCraft is a novel multiplayer hidden-role game in which players select an ethical alignment and execute strategies over a long time-horizon to accomplish missions. Cooperators work together to solve event challenges and expose bad actors, while Defectors evade suspicion while secretly sabotaging missions. To enable real-world relevance, we develop 10 grounded scenarios such as childcare, hospital resource allocation, and loan underwriting that recontextualize the underlying mechanics in ethically significant, high-stakes domains. We ensure balanced gameplay in LieCraft through careful design of game mechanics and reward structures that incentivize meaningful strategic choices while eliminating degenerate strategies. Beyond the framework itself, we report results from 12 state-of-the-art LLMs across three behavioral axes: propensity to defect, deception skill, and accusation accuracy. Our findings reveal that despite differences in competence and overall alignment, all models are willing to act unethically, conceal their intentions, and outright lie to pursue their goals.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.06874

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Can Agents Deceive? Evaluating Reasoning and Deception in ParliamentBench using a Social Deduction Game

2026-07-30 · Niklas Bauer, Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Akiko Aizawa, Jan Philip Wahle 외 arxiv

As large language models (LLMs) are deployed as agents in high-stakes settings, such as medical and legal systems, understanding their deceptive capabilities is fundamental to safety. Controlled social deduction games pr…

Benchmarking Web Agent Safety under E-commerce Deceptive Interfaces

2026-04-26 · Zijing Shi, Meng Fang, Ling Chen arxiv

As autonomous web agents are increasingly deployed to perform real-world tasks, ensuring their safety has become a critical concern. In this work, we study web agent behavior under realistic deceptive interfaces in the e…

Personality-Driven Decision-Making in LLM-Based Autonomous Agents

2025-04-01 · Lewis Newsham, Daniel Prince

The embedding of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous agents is a rapidly developing field which enables dynamic, configurable behaviours without the need for extensive domain-specific training. In our previous w…

Decision MakingSchedulingTask Planning

Empirical Software Engineering TerraProbe: A Layered-Oracle Framework for Detecting Deceptive Fixes in LLM-Assisted Terraform

2026-06-25 · Manar Alsaid, Chimdumebi Nebolisa, Faris Abbas arxiv

Security misconfigurations in Terraform Infrastructure-as-Code are a growing risk in cloud deployments, and large language models are increasingly used as automated repair agents. Existing evaluations often treat a repai…

LH-Deception: Simulating and Understanding LLM Deceptive Behaviors in Long-Horizon Interactions

2025-10-05 · Yang Xu, Xuanming Zhang, Samuel Yeh, Jwala Dhamala 외 arxiv

Deception is a pervasive feature of human communication and an emerging concern in large language models (LLMs). While recent studies document instances of LLM deception, most evaluations remain confined to single-turn p…