LLM-Extracted Covariates for Clinical Causal Inference: Rethinking Integration Strategies
Causal inference from electronic health records (EHR) is fundamentally limited by unmeasured confounding: critical clinical states such as frailty, goals of care, and mental status are documented in free-text notes but absent from structured data. Large language models can extract these latent confounders as interpretable, structured covariates, yet how to effectively integrate them into causal estimation pipelines has not been systematically studied. Using the MIMIC-IV database with 21,859 sepsis patients, we compare seven covariate-integration strategies for estimating the effect of early vasopressor initiation on 28-day mortality, spanning tabular-only baselines, traditional NLP representations, and three LLM-augmented approaches. A central finding is that not all integration strategies are equally effective: directly augmenting the propensity score model with LLM covariates achieves the best performance, while dual-caliper matching on text-derived categorical distances restricts the donor pool and degrades estimation. In semi-synthetic experiments with known ground-truth effects, LLM-augmented propensity scores reduce estimation bias from 0.0143 to 0.0003 relative to tabular-only methods, and this advantage persists under substantial simulated extraction error. On real data, incorporating LLM-extracted covariates reduces the estimated treatment effect from 0.055 to 0.027, directionally consistent with the CLOVERS randomized trial, and a doubly robust estimator yielding 0.019 confirms the robustness of this finding. Our results offer practical guidance on when and how text-derived covariates improve causal estimation in critical care.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Causal InferenceSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
ConfoundingSHAP: Quantifying confounding strength in causal inference
In causal inference, confounders are variables that influence both treatment decisions and outcomes. However, unlike as in randomized clinical trials, the treatment assignment mechanism in observational studies is not kn…
Causal InferenceCDS -- Causal Inference with Deep Survival Model and Time-varying Covariates
Causal inference in longitudinal observational health data often requires the accurate estimation of treatment effects on time-to-event outcomes in the presence of time-varying covariates. To tackle this sequential treat…
Causal InferenceRecommendation SystemsSurvival AnalysisCausal Inference with Noisy and Missing Covariates via Matrix Factorization
Valid causal inference in observational studies often requires controlling for confounders. However, in practice measurements of confounders may be noisy, and can lead to biased estimates of causal effects. We show that …
Causal InferenceMatrix CompletionMissing ValuesvalidEstimating Causal Effects With Partial Covariates For Clinical Interpretability
Estimating the causal effects of an intervention in the presence of confounding is a frequently occurring problem in applications such as medicine. The task is challenging since there may be multiple confounding factors,…
Causal InferenceDoes Misclassifying Non-confounding Covariates as Confounders Affect the Causal Inference within the Potential Outcomes Framework?
The Potential Outcome Framework (POF) plays a prominent role in the field of causal inference. Most causal inference models based on the POF (CIMs-POF) are designed for eliminating confounding bias and default to an unde…
Causal Inferencecounterfactual