Lost in Translation: How Language Re-Aligns Vision for Cross-Species Pathology
Foundation models are increasingly applied to computational pathology, yet their behavior under cross-cancer and cross-species transfer remains unspecified. This study investigated how fine-tuning CPath-CLIP affects cancer detection under same-cancer, cross-cancer, and cross-species conditions using whole-slide image patches from canine and human histopathology. Performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Few-shot fine-tuning improved same-cancer (64.9% to 72.6% AUC) and cross-cancer performance (56.84% to 66.31% AUC). Cross-species evaluation revealed that while tissue matching enables meaningful transfer, performance remains below state-of-the-art benchmarks (H-optimus-0: 84.97% AUC), indicating that standard vision-language alignment is suboptimal for cross-species generalization. Embedding space analysis revealed extremely high cosine similarity (greater than 0.99) between tumor and normal prototypes. Grad-CAM shows prototype-based models remain domain-locked, while language-guided models attend to conserved tumor morphology. To address this, we introduce Semantic Anchoring, which uses language to provide a stable coordinate system for visual features. Ablation studies reveal that benefits stem from the text-alignment mechanism itself, regardless of text encoder complexity. Benchmarking against H-optimus-0 shows that CPath-CLIP's failure stems from intrinsic embedding collapse, which text alignment effectively circumvents. Additional gains were observed in same-cancer (8.52%) and cross-cancer classification (5.67%). We identified a previously uncharacterized failure mode: semantic collapse driven by species-dominated alignment rather than missing visual information. These results demonstrate that language acts as a control mechanism, enabling semantic re-interpretation without retraining.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Cancer ClassificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation
Human evaluation of machine translation is in an arms race with translation model quality: as our models get better, our evaluation methods need to be improved to ensure that quality gains are not lost in evaluation nois…
Machine TranslationLost in Translation? Translation Errors and Challenges for Fair Assessment of Text-to-Image Models on Multilingual Concepts
Benchmarks of the multilingual capabilities of text-to-image (T2I) models compare generated images prompted in a test language to an expected image distribution over a concept set. One such benchmark, "Conceptual Coverag…
TranslationCL2CM: Improving Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval via Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer
Cross-lingual cross-modal retrieval has garnered increasing attention recently, which aims to achieve the alignment between vision and target language (V-T) without using any annotated V-T data pairs. Current methods emp…
Cross-Lingual TransferCross-Modal RetrievalMachine TranslationRetrieval+2"Is Hate Lost in Translation?": Evaluation of Multilingual LGBTQIA+ Hate Speech Detection
This paper explores the challenges of detecting LGBTQIA+ hate speech of large language models across multiple languages, including English, Italian, Chinese and (code-switched) English-Tamil, examining the impact of mach…
Hate Speech DetectionMachine TranslationTranslationLost in Translation, Found in Embeddings: Sign Language Translation and Alignment
Our aim is to develop a unified model for sign language understanding, that performs sign language translation (SLT) and sign-subtitle alignment (SSA). Together, these two tasks enable the conversion of continuous signin…
Sign Language Translation