paper-with-me

Papers

MAD-Fact: A Multi-Agent Debate Framework for Long-Form Factuality Evaluation in LLMs

2025-10-27 · Yucheng Ning, Xixun Lin, Fang Fang, Yanan Cao arxiv

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) raises critical concerns about the factual accuracy of their outputs, especially in high-risk domains such as biomedicine, law, and education. Existing evaluation methods for short texts often fail on long-form content due to complex reasoning chains, intertwined perspectives, and cumulative information. To address this, we propose a systematic approach integrating large-scale long-form datasets, multi-agent verification mechanisms, and weighted evaluation metrics. We construct LongHalluQA, a Chinese long-form factuality dataset; and develop MAD-Fact, a debate-based multi-agent verification system. We introduce a fact importance hierarchy to capture the varying significance of claims in long-form texts. Experiments on two benchmarks show that larger LLMs generally maintain higher factual consistency, while domestic models excel on Chinese content. Our work provides a structured framework for evaluating and enhancing factual reliability in long-form LLM outputs, guiding their safe deployment in sensitive domains.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.22967

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Tool-MAD: A Multi-Agent Debate Framework for Fact Verification with Diverse Tool Augmentation and Adaptive Retrieval

2026-01-08 · Seyeon Jeong, Yeonjun Choi, JongWook Kim, Beakcheol Jang arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations and factual inaccuracies, especially in complex reasoning and fact verification tasks. Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) systems aim to improve answer accuracy by enabling m…

Fact Verification

Debating Truth: Debate-driven Claim Verification with Multiple Large Language Model Agents

2025-07-25 · Haorui He, Yupeng Li, Dacheng Wen, Yang Chen 외 arxiv

State-of-the-art single-agent claim verification methods struggle with complex claims that require nuanced analysis of multifaceted evidence. Inspired by real-world professional fact-checkers, we propose \textbf{DebateCV…

RedDebate: Safer Responses through Multi-Agent Red Teaming Debates

2025-06-04 · Ali Asad, Stephen Obadinma, Radin Shayanfar, Xiaodan Zhu

We propose RedDebate, a novel multi-agent debate framework that leverages adversarial argumentation among Large Language Models (LLMs) to proactively identify and mitigate their own unsafe behaviours. Existing AI safety …

Red Teaming

Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topology

2024-06-17 · Yunxuan Li, Yibing Du, Jiageng Zhang, Le Hou 외

Multi-agent debate has proven effective in improving large language models quality for reasoning and factuality tasks. While various role-playing strategies in multi-agent debates have been explored, in terms of the comm…

Multimodal Reasoning

The Confident Liar: Diagnosing Multi-Agent Debate with Log-Probabilities and LLM-as-Judge

2026-06-09 · Ali Keramati, Justin Cheok, Jacob Horne, Mark Warschauer arxiv

Multi-agent debate systems are typically evaluated only on whether the final answer is correct, overlooking the quality of the intermediate reasoning that debate is designed to produce. This paper studies the relationshi…

Mathematical ReasoningInstruction FollowingQuestion Answering