paper-with-me

Papers

MAP- and MLE-Based Teaching

2023-07-11 · Hans Ulrich Simon, Jan Arne Telle

Imagine a learner L who tries to infer a hidden concept from a collection of observations. Building on the work [4] of Ferri et al., we assume the learner to be parameterized by priors P(c) and by c-conditional likelihoods P(z|c) where c ranges over all concepts in a given class C and z ranges over all observations in an observation set Z. L is called a MAP-learner (resp. an MLE-learner) if it thinks of a collection S of observations as a random sample and returns the concept with the maximum a-posteriori probability (resp. the concept which maximizes the c-conditional likelihood of S). Depending on whether L assumes that S is obtained from ordered or unordered sampling resp. from sampling with or without replacement, we can distinguish four different sampling modes. Given a target concept c in C, a teacher for a MAP-learner L aims at finding a smallest collection of observations that causes L to return c. This approach leads in a natural manner to various notions of a MAP- or MLE-teaching dimension of a concept class C. Our main results are: We show that this teaching model has some desirable monotonicity properties. We clarify how the four sampling modes are related to each other. As for the (important!) special case, where concepts are subsets of a domain and observations are 0,1-labeled examples, we obtain some additional results. First of all, we characterize the MAP- and MLE-teaching dimension associated with an optimally parameterized MAP-learner graph-theoretically. From this central result, some other ones are easy to derive. It is shown, for instance, that the MLE-teaching dimension is either equal to the MAP-teaching dimension or exceeds the latter by 1. It is shown furthermore that these dimensions can be bounded from above by the so-called antichain number, the VC-dimension and related combinatorial parameters. Moreover they can be computed in polynomial time.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2307.05252

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

One-shot Machine Teaching: Cost Very Few Examples to Converge Faster

2022-12-13 · Chen Zhang, Xiaofeng Cao, Yi Chang, Ivor W Tsang

Artificial intelligence is to teach machines to take actions like humans. To achieve intelligent teaching, the machine learning community becomes to think about a promising topic named machine teaching where the teacher …

The Teaching Dimension of Kernel Perceptron

2020-10-27 · Akash Kumar, Hanqi Zhang, Adish Singla, Yuxin Chen

Algorithmic machine teaching has been studied under the linear setting where exact teaching is possible. However, little is known for teaching nonlinear learners. Here, we establish the sample complexity of teaching, aka…

Teaching is a Process: The TOSS Framework for Modeling Human Teaching Decisions in Human-Interactive Robot Learning

2026-08-21 · Bernhard Hilpert, Kim Baraka, Joost Broekens arxiv

Successful Human-Robot Teaching assumes alignment between robot processing needs and human teaching intent. To better understand this alignment, this work seeks to uncover the underlying logic that humans intuitively app…

Reinforcement Learning

Distribution Matching for Machine Teaching

2021-05-06 · Xiaofeng Cao, Ivor W. Tsang

Machine teaching is an inverse problem of machine learning that aims at steering the student learner towards its target hypothesis, in which the teacher has already known the student's learning parameters. Previous studi…

Iterative Machine Teaching without Teachers

2020-06-27 · Mingzhe Yang, Yukino Baba

Iterative machine teaching is a method for selecting an optimal teaching example that enables a student to efficiently learn a target concept at each iteration. Existing studies on iterative machine teaching are based on…