paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle

2024-04-29 · Luca Deck, Astrid Schomäcker, Timo Speith, Jakob Schöffer, Lena Kästner, Niklas Kühl

The widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across various domains is increasingly surfacing issues related to algorithmic fairness, especially in high-stakes scenarios. Thus, critical considerations of how fairness in AI systems might be improved -- and what measures are available to aid this process -- are overdue. Many researchers and policymakers see explainable AI (XAI) as a promising way to increase fairness in AI systems. However, there is a wide variety of XAI methods and fairness conceptions expressing different desiderata, and the precise connections between XAI and fairness remain largely nebulous. Besides, different measures to increase algorithmic fairness might be applicable at different points throughout an AI system's lifecycle. Yet, there currently is no coherent mapping of fairness desiderata along the AI lifecycle. In this paper, we we distill eight fairness desiderata, map them along the AI lifecycle, and discuss how XAI could help address each of them. We hope to provide orientation for practical applications and to inspire XAI research specifically focused on these fairness desiderata.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2404.18736

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Explainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Fairness

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A Catalog of Fairness-Aware Practices in Machine Learning Engineering

2024-08-29 · Gianmario Voria, Giulia Sellitto, Carmine Ferrara, Francesco Abate 외

Machine learning's widespread adoption in decision-making processes raises concerns about fairness, particularly regarding the treatment of sensitive features and potential discrimination against minorities. The software…

Decision MakingFairness

A Seven-Layer Model for Standardising AI Fairness Assessment

2022-12-21 · Avinash Agarwal, Harsh Agarwal

Problem statement: Standardisation of AI fairness rules and benchmarks is challenging because AI fairness and other ethical requirements depend on multiple factors such as context, use case, type of the AI system, and so…

BenchmarkingFairness

Revisiting Fairness-aware Interactive Recommendation: Item Lifecycle as a Control Knob

2025-11-20 · Yun Lu, Xiaoyu Shi, Hong Xie, Chongjun Xia 외 arxiv

This paper revisits fairness-aware interactive recommendation (e.g., TikTok, KuaiShou) by introducing a novel control knob, i.e., the lifecycle of items. We make threefold contributions. First, we conduct a comprehensive…

Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

Fairness Vs. Personalization: Towards Equity in Epistemic Utility

2023-09-05 · Jennifer Chien, David Danks

The applications of personalized recommender systems are rapidly expanding: encompassing social media, online shopping, search engine results, and more. These systems offer a more efficient way to navigate the vast array…

FairnessNavigateRecommendation Systems

Assessing High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act: From Legal Requirements to Technical Verification

2025-12-15 · Alessio Buscemi, Tom Deckenbrunnen, Fahria Kabir, Kateryna Mishchenko 외 arxiv

The implementation of the AI Act requires practical mechanisms to verify compliance with legal obligations, yet concrete and operational mappings from high-level requirements to verifiable assessment activities remain li…