paper-with-me

Papers

MBD: A Model-Based Debiasing Framework Across User, Content, and Model Dimensions

2026-03-15 · Yuantong Li, Lei Yuan, Zhihao Zheng, Weimiao Wu, Songbin Liu, Jeong Min Lee, Ali Selman Aydin, Shaofeng Deng, Junbo Chen, Xinyi Zhang, Hongjing Xia, Sam Fieldman, Matthew Kosko, Wei Fu, Du Zhang, Peiyu Yang, Albert Jin Chung, Xianlei Qiu, Miao Yu, Zhongwei Teng, Hao Chen, Sunny Baek, Hui Tang, Yang Lv, Renze Wang, Qifan Wang, Zhan Li, Tiantian Xu, Peng Wu, Ji Liu arxiv

Modern recommendation systems rank candidates by aggregating multiple behavioral signals through a value model. However, many commonly used signals are inherently affected by heterogeneous biases. For example, watch time naturally favors long-form content, loop rate favors short - form content, and comment probability favors videos over images. Such biases introduce two critical issues: (1) value model scores may be systematically misaligned with users' relative preferences - for instance, a seemingly low absolute like probability may represent exceptionally strong interest for a user who rarely engages; and (2) changes in value modeling rules can trigger abrupt and undesirable ecosystem shifts. In this work, we ask a fundamental question: can biased behavioral signals be systematically transformed into unbiased signals, under a user - defined notion of ``unbiasedness'', that are both personalized and adaptive? We propose a general, model-based debiasing (MBD) framework that addresses this challenge by augmenting it with distributional modeling. By conditioning on a flexible subset of features (partial feature set), we explicitly estimate the contextual mean and variance of the engagement distribution for arbitrary cohorts (e.g., specific video lengths or user regions) directly alongside the main prediction. This integration allows the framework to convert biased raw signals into unbiased representations, enabling the construction of higher-level, calibrated signals (such as percentiles or z - scores) suitable for the value model. Importantly, the definition of unbiasedness is flexible and controllable, allowing the system to adapt to different personalization objectives and modeling preferences. Crucially, this is implemented as a lightweight, built-in branch of the existing MTML ranking model, requiring no separate serving infrastructure.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.14422

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Recommendation Systems

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Social-Group-Agnostic Word Embedding Debiasing via the Stereotype Content Model

2022-10-11 · Ali Omrani, Brendan Kennedy, Mohammad Atari, Morteza Dehghani

Existing word embedding debiasing methods require social-group-specific word pairs (e.g., "man"-"woman") for each social attribute (e.g., gender), which cannot be used to mitigate bias for other social groups, making the…

Attribute

MAFIA: Multi-Adapter Fused Inclusive LanguAge Models

2024-02-12 · Prachi Jain, Ashutosh Sathe, Varun Gumma, Kabir Ahuja 외

Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) are widely used in NLP for various tasks. Recent studies have identified various biases that such models exhibit and have proposed methods to correct these biases. However, most of the w…

counterfactualData AugmentationLanguage ModelingLanguage Modelling

A Taxonomy of Stereotype Content in Large Language Models

2024-07-31 · Gandalf Nicolas, Aylin Caliskan

This study introduces a taxonomy of stereotype content in contemporary large language models (LLMs). We prompt ChatGPT 3.5, Llama 3, and Mixtral 8x7B, three powerful and widely used LLMs, for the characteristics associat…

Aligning Recommendations with User Popularity Preferences

2026-04-01 · Mona Schirmer, Anton Thielmann, Pola Schwöbel, Thomas Martynec 외 arxiv

Popularity bias is a pervasive problem in recommender systems, where recommendations disproportionately favor popular items. This not only results in "rich-get-richer" dynamics and a homogenization of visible content, bu…

BiasFreeBench: a Benchmark for Mitigating Bias in Large Language Model Responses

2025-09-30 · Xin Xu, Xunzhi He, Churan Zhi, Ruizhe Chen 외 arxiv

Existing studies on bias mitigation methods for large language models (LLMs) use diverse baselines and metrics to evaluate debiasing performance, leading to inconsistent comparisons among them. Moreover, their evaluation…