Measuring AI Systems Beyond Accuracy
Current test and evaluation (T&E) methods for assessing machine learning (ML) system performance often rely on incomplete metrics. Testing is additionally often siloed from the other phases of the ML system lifecycle. Research investigating cross-domain approaches to ML T&E is needed to drive the state of the art forward and to build an Artificial Intelligence (AI) engineering discipline. This paper advocates for a robust, integrated approach to testing by outlining six key questions for guiding a holistic T&E strategy.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistency
A central problem in cognitive science and behavioural neuroscience as well as in machine learning and artificial intelligence research is to ascertain whether two or more decision makers (be they brains or algorithms) u…
Decision MakingObject RecognitionLABBench2: An Improved Benchmark for AI Systems Performing Biology Research
Optimism for accelerating scientific discovery with AI continues to grow. Current applications of AI in scientific research range from training dedicated foundation models on scientific data to agentic autonomous hypothe…
Measuring Intelligence Beyond Human Scale
How can we measure intelligence beyond human capability? Human-authored benchmarks saturate, and above human capability, examiners may not know which tasks are both hard and verifiable. We argue that this difficulty is i…
Measuring Lexical Cohesion: Beyond Word Repetition
Beyond Accuracy: Measuring Logical Compliance of Predictive Models
Machine learning models are predominantly evaluated through predictive performance metrics such as ranking quality, prediction error, or classification accuracy. While these metrics effectively quantify how closely predi…
Link Prediction