paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

MedAgentsBench: Benchmarking Thinking Models and Agent Frameworks for Complex Medical Reasoning

2025-03-10 · Xiangru Tang, Daniel Shao, Jiwoong Sohn, Jiapeng Chen, Jiayi Zhang, Jinyu Xiang, Fang Wu, Yilun Zhao, Chenglin Wu, Wenqi Shi, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on existing medical question-answering benchmarks. This high performance makes it increasingly difficult to meaningfully evaluate and differentiate advanced methods. We present MedAgentsBench, a benchmark that focuses on challenging medical questions requiring multi-step clinical reasoning, diagnosis formulation, and treatment planning-scenarios where current models still struggle despite their strong performance on standard tests. Drawing from seven established medical datasets, our benchmark addresses three key limitations in existing evaluations: (1) the prevalence of straightforward questions where even base models achieve high performance, (2) inconsistent sampling and evaluation protocols across studies, and (3) lack of systematic analysis of the interplay between performance, cost, and inference time. Through experiments with various base models and reasoning methods, we demonstrate that the latest thinking models, DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o3, exhibit exceptional performance in complex medical reasoning tasks. Additionally, advanced search-based agent methods offer promising performance-to-cost ratios compared to traditional approaches. Our analysis reveals substantial performance gaps between model families on complex questions and identifies optimal model selections for different computational constraints. Our benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at https://github.com/gersteinlab/medagents-benchmark.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2503.07459

Code (1)

gersteinlab/medagents-benchmark 공식 구현

Tasks

BenchmarkingMedical Question AnsweringQuestion Answering

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

BASE 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skill in Agentic Harness

2026-05-04 · Jianing Wang, Linsen Guo, Zhengyu Chen, Qi Guo 외 arxiv

Recent advances in agentic harness with orchestration frameworks that coordinate multiple agents with memory, skills, and tool use have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks. However, the underlying mech…

Reinforcement Learning

Meta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

2025-04-20 · Ahsan Bilal, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Muhammad Umer, Muhammad Awais Khan Bangash 외

This survey explores the development of meta-thinking capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) from a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) perspective. Meta-thinking self-reflection, assessment, and control of t…

Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningSurvey

CausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in Games

2026-07-05 · Zhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu, Junchi Yu 외 arxiv

Building AI Scientist agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention. Since scientific discovery fundamentally relies on uncovering causal relationships from observations, the capabilit…

GSEM: Graph-based Self-Evolving Memory for Experience Augmented Clinical Reasoning

2026-03-23 · Xiao Han, Yuzheng Fan, Sendong Zhao, Haochun Wang 외 arxiv

Clinical decision-making agents can benefit from reusing prior decision experience. However, many memory-augmented methods store experiences as independent records without explicit relational structure, which may introdu…

Position: Emergent Machina Sapiens Urge Rethinking Multi-Agent Paradigms

2025-02-05 · Hepeng Li, Yuhong Liu, Jun Yan, Jie Gao 외

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents capable of autonomous learning and independent decision-making hold great promise for addressing complex challenges across various critical infrastructure domains, including transporta…

Decision MakingPosition