MedAgentsBench: Benchmarking Thinking Models and Agent Frameworks for Complex Medical Reasoning
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on existing medical question-answering benchmarks. This high performance makes it increasingly difficult to meaningfully evaluate and differentiate advanced methods. We present MedAgentsBench, a benchmark that focuses on challenging medical questions requiring multi-step clinical reasoning, diagnosis formulation, and treatment planning-scenarios where current models still struggle despite their strong performance on standard tests. Drawing from seven established medical datasets, our benchmark addresses three key limitations in existing evaluations: (1) the prevalence of straightforward questions where even base models achieve high performance, (2) inconsistent sampling and evaluation protocols across studies, and (3) lack of systematic analysis of the interplay between performance, cost, and inference time. Through experiments with various base models and reasoning methods, we demonstrate that the latest thinking models, DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o3, exhibit exceptional performance in complex medical reasoning tasks. Additionally, advanced search-based agent methods offer promising performance-to-cost ratios compared to traditional approaches. Our analysis reveals substantial performance gaps between model families on complex questions and identifies optimal model selections for different computational constraints. Our benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at https://github.com/gersteinlab/medagents-benchmark.
Code (1)
Tasks
BenchmarkingMedical Question AnsweringQuestion AnsweringMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skill in Agentic Harness
Recent advances in agentic harness with orchestration frameworks that coordinate multiple agents with memory, skills, and tool use have achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks. However, the underlying mech…
Reinforcement LearningMeta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
This survey explores the development of meta-thinking capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) from a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) perspective. Meta-thinking self-reflection, assessment, and control of t…
Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningSurveyCausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in Games
Building AI Scientist agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention. Since scientific discovery fundamentally relies on uncovering causal relationships from observations, the capabilit…
GSEM: Graph-based Self-Evolving Memory for Experience Augmented Clinical Reasoning
Clinical decision-making agents can benefit from reusing prior decision experience. However, many memory-augmented methods store experiences as independent records without explicit relational structure, which may introdu…
Position: Emergent Machina Sapiens Urge Rethinking Multi-Agent Paradigms
Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents capable of autonomous learning and independent decision-making hold great promise for addressing complex challenges across various critical infrastructure domains, including transporta…
Decision MakingPosition