paper-with-me

Papers

Metacognitive Learning Approach for Online Tool Condition Monitoring

2017-05-06 · Mahardhika Pratama, Eric Dimla, Chow Yin Lai, Edwin Lughofer

As manufacturing processes become increasingly automated, so should tool condition monitoring (TCM) as it is impractical to have human workers monitor the state of the tools continuously. Tool condition is crucial to ensure the good quality of products: Worn tools affect not only the surface quality but also the dimensional accuracy, which means higher reject rate of the products. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify tool failures before it occurs on the fly. While various versions of intelligent tool condition monitoring have been proposed, most of them suffer from a cognitive nature of traditional machine learning algorithms. They focus on the how to learn process without paying attention to other two crucial issues: what to learn, and when to learn. The what to learn and the when to learn provide self regulating mechanisms to select the training samples and to determine time instants to train a model. A novel tool condition monitoring approach based on a psychologically plausible concept, namely the metacognitive scaffolding theory, is proposed and built upon a recently published algorithm, recurrent classifier (rClass). The learning process consists of three phases: what to learn, how to learn, when to learn and makes use of a generalized recurrent network structure as a cognitive component. Experimental studies with real-world manufacturing data streams were conducted where rClass demonstrated the highest accuracy while retaining the lowest complexity over its counterparts.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1705.02477

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

What Is Going through Your Mind? Metacognitive Events Classification in Human-Agent Interactions

2022-06-01 · ISA (LREC) 2022 6 · Hafiza Erum Manzoor, Volha Petukhova

For an agent, either human or artificial, to show intelligent interactive behaviour implies assessments of the reliability of own and others’ thoughts, feelings and beliefs. Agents capable of these robust evaluations are…

Decision Makingvalid

MAGELLAN: Metacognitive predictions of learning progress guide autotelic LLM agents in large goal spaces

2025-02-11 · Loris Gaven, Thomas Carta, Clément Romac, Cédric Colas 외

Open-ended learning agents must efficiently prioritize goals in vast possibility spaces, focusing on those that maximize learning progress (LP). When such autotelic exploration is achieved by LLM agents trained with onli…

The Metacognitive Monitoring Battery: A Cross-Domain Benchmark for LLM Self-Monitoring

2026-04-17 · Jon-Paul Cacioli arxiv

We introduce a cross-domain behavioural assay of monitoring-control coupling in LLMs, grounded in the Nelson and Narens (1990) metacognitive framework and applying human psychometric methodology to LLM evaluation. The ba…

Metacognitive Myopia in Large Language Models

2024-08-10 · Florian Scholten, Tobias R. Rebholz, Mandy Hütter

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit potentially harmful biases that reinforce culturally inherent stereotypes, cloud moral judgments, or amplify positive evaluations of majority groups. Previous explanations mainly attr…

Monitor-Generate-Verify (MGV): Formalising Metacognitive Theory for Language Model Reasoning

2025-11-06 · Nick Oh, Fernand Gobet arxiv

Test-time reasoning architectures such as those following the Generate-Verify paradigm, where a model iteratively refines or verifies its own generated outputs, prioritise generation and verification but exclude the moni…