paper-with-me

Papers

Mitigating Partial Observability in Sequential Decision Processes via the Lambda Discrepancy

2024-07-10 · Cameron Allen, Aaron Kirtland, Ruo Yu Tao, Sam Lobel, Daniel Scott, Nicholas Petrocelli, Omer Gottesman, Ronald Parr, Michael L. Littman, George Konidaris

Reinforcement learning algorithms typically rely on the assumption that the environment dynamics and value function can be expressed in terms of a Markovian state representation. However, when state information is only partially observable, how can an agent learn such a state representation, and how can it detect when it has found one? We introduce a metric that can accomplish both objectives, without requiring access to -- or knowledge of -- an underlying, unobservable state space. Our metric, the $\lambda$-discrepancy, is the difference between two distinct temporal difference (TD) value estimates, each computed using TD($\lambda$) with a different value of $\lambda$. Since TD($\lambda{=}0$) makes an implicit Markov assumption and TD($\lambda{=}1$) does not, a discrepancy between these estimates is a potential indicator of a non-Markovian state representation. Indeed, we prove that the $\lambda$-discrepancy is exactly zero for all Markov decision processes and almost always non-zero for a broad class of partially observable environments. We also demonstrate empirically that, once detected, minimizing the $\lambda$-discrepancy can help with learning a memory function to mitigate the corresponding partial observability. We then train a reinforcement learning agent that simultaneously constructs two recurrent value networks with different $\lambda$ parameters and minimizes the difference between them as an auxiliary loss. The approach scales to challenging partially observable domains, where the resulting agent frequently performs significantly better (and never performs worse) than a baseline recurrent agent with only a single value network.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2407.07333

Code (1)

brownirl/lambda_discrepancy 공식 구현 jax

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Robust Active Measuring under Model Uncertainty

2023-12-18 · Merlijn Krale, Thiago D. Simão, Jana Tumova, Nils Jansen

Partial observability and uncertainty are common problems in sequential decision-making that particularly impede the use of formal models such as Markov decision processes (MDPs). However, in practice, agents may be able…

Decision MakingmodelSequential Decision Making

A Framework of decision-relevant observability: Reinforcement Learning converges under relative ignorability

2025-04-10 · MaryLena Bleile

From clinical dosing algorithms to autonomous robots, sequential decision-making systems routinely operate with missing or incomplete data. Classical reinforcement learning theory, which is commonly used to solve sequent…

Causal InferenceDecision MakingLearning TheoryQ-Learning+3

Uncertainty Representations in State-Space Layers for Deep Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observability

2024-09-25 · Carlos E. Luis, Alessandro G. Bottero, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp 외

Optimal decision-making under partial observability requires reasoning about the uncertainty of the environment's hidden state. However, most reinforcement learning architectures handle partial observability with sequenc…

Decision MakingDeep Reinforcement Learningreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning+1

Off-Policy Evaluation in Partially Observable Environments

2019-09-09 · Guy Tennenholtz, Shie Mannor, Uri Shalit

This work studies the problem of batch off-policy evaluation for Reinforcement Learning in partially observable environments. Off-policy evaluation under partial observability is inherently prone to bias, with risk of ar…

Off-policy evaluationReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)

On the Relationship Between Structure in Natural Language and Models of Sequential Decision Processes

2020-06-12 · ICML Workshop LaReL 2020 7 · Roma Patel, Rafael Rodriguez-Sanchez, George Konidaris

Human language is distinguished by powerful semantics, rich structure, and incredible flexibility. It enables us to communicate with each other, thereby affecting the decisions we make and actions we take. While Artifici…

Decision MakingSequential Decision Making