Mol-Debate: Multi-Agent Debate Improves Structural Reasoning in Molecular Design
Text-guided molecular design is a key capability for AI-driven drug discovery, yet it remains challenging to map sequential natural-language instructions with non-linear molecular structures under strict chemical constraints. Most existing approaches, including RAG, CoT prompting, and fine-tuning or RL, emphasize a small set of ad-hoc reasoning perspectives implemented in a largely one-shot generation pipeline. In contrast, real-world drug discovery relies on dynamic, multi-perspective critique and iterative refinement to reconcile semantic intent with structural feasibility. Motivated by this, we propose Mol-Debate, a generation paradigm that enables such dynamic reasoning through an iterative generate-debate-refine loop. We further characterize key challenges in this paradigm and address them through perspective-oriented orchestration, including developer-debater conflict, global-local structural reasoning, and static-dynamic integration. Experiments demonstrate that Mol-Debate achieves state-of-the-art performance against strong general and chemical baselines, reaching 59.82% exact match on ChEBI-20 and 50.52% weighted success rate on S$^2$-Bench. Our code is available at https://github.com/wyuzh/Mol-Debate.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Drug DiscoverySimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
L-MAD: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Structures in Legal Reasoning
While multi-agent debate (MAD) frameworks have shown significant potential in general reasoning, their effectiveness in highly structured, knowledge-heavy legal domains remains under-explored. In this work, we introduce …
Legal ReasoningPEAR: Permutation-Equivariant Adaptive Routing Multi-Agent Debate
Multi-agent debate improves the reliability of large language models (LLMs) through iterative peer critiques. However, fixed topologies often introduce persistent positional biases, amplify unreliable agents, and cause h…
Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignment
Large Language Models (LLMs) need to adapt their predictions to diverse cultural contexts to benefit diverse communities across the world. While previous efforts have focused on single-LLM, single-turn approaches, we pro…
ARMOR-MAD: Adaptive Routing for Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Debate in Large Language Model Reasoning
Multi-agent debate (MAD) can improve large language model reasoning, but fixed debate pipelines often waste computation and can amplify correlated errors among similar agents. We propose ARMOR-MAD, a training-free hetero…
Outlier DetectionMulti-Agent Debate with Memory Masking
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities in reasoning tasks. Currently, mainstream LLM reasoning frameworks predominantly focus on scaling up inference-time sampling to enhance perf…
Logical Reasoning