paper-with-me

Papers

Monitorability as a Free Gift: How RLVR Spontaneously Aligns Reasoning

2026-02-03 · Zidi Xiong, Shan Chen, Himabindu Lakkaraju arxiv

As Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are increasingly deployed, auditing their chain-of-thought (CoT) traces for safety becomes critical. Recent work has reported that monitorability--the degree to which CoT faithfully and informatively reflects internal computation--can appear as a "free gift" during the early stages of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). We make this observation concrete through a systematic evaluation across model families and training domains. Our results show that this effect is not universal: monitorability improvements are strongly data-dependent. In particular, we demonstrate the critical role of data diversity and instruction-following data during RLVR training. We further show that monitorability is orthogonal to capability--improvements in reasoning performance do not imply increased transparency. Through mechanistic analysis, we attribute monitorability gains primarily to response distribution sharpening (entropy reduction) and increased attention to the prompt, rather than stronger causal reliance on reasoning traces. We also reveal how monitorability dynamics vary with controlled training and evaluation difficulty. Together, these findings provide a holistic view of how monitorability emerges under RLVR, clarifying when gains are likely to occur and when they are not.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2602.03978

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

GIFT: Group-Relative Implicit Fine-Tuning Integrates GRPO with DPO and UNA

2025-10-27 · Zhichao Wang arxiv

This paper investigates whether reward matching is a viable alternative to reward maximization methods for on-policy RL of LLMs. Group-relative Implicit Fine-Tuning (GIFT) is proposed, combining GRPO-style group sampling…

GiFT: Gibbs Fine-Tuning for Code Generation

2025-02-17 · Haochen Li, Wanjin Feng, Xin Zhou, Zhiqi Shen

Training Large Language Models (LLMs) with synthetic data is a prevalent practice in code generation. A key approach is self-training, where LLMs are iteratively trained on self-generated correct code snippets. In this c…

Code Generationvalid

Monitoring Monitorability

2025-12-20 · Melody Y. Guan, Miles Wang, Micah Carroll, Zehao Dou 외 arxiv

Observability into the decision making of modern AI systems may be required to safely deploy increasingly capable agents. Monitoring the chain-of-thought (CoT) of today's reasoning models has proven effective for detecti…

Reinforcement LearningDecision Making

MonitorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability in Large Language Models

2026-03-30 · Han Wang, Yifan Sun, Brian Ko, Mann Talati 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) can generate chains of thought (CoTs) that are not always causally responsible for their final outputs. When such a mismatch occurs, the CoT no longer faithfully reflects the actual reasons (…

Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety

2025-07-15 · Tomek Korbak, Mikita Balesni, Elizabeth Barnes, Yoshua Bengio 외

AI systems that "think" in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety: we can monitor their chains of thought (CoT) for the intent to misbehave. Like all other known AI oversight methods, CoT monitoring is i…