paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Natural reward as the fundamental macroevolutionary force

2019-03-22

Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection does not predict long-term progress or advancement, nor does it provide a useful way to define or understand these concepts. Nevertheless, the history of life is marked by major trends that appear progressive, and seemingly more advanced forms of life have appeared. To reconcile theory and fact, evolutionists have proposed novel theories that extend natural selection to levels and time frames not justified by the original structure of Darwin's theory. To extend evolutionary theory without violating the most basic tenets of Darwinism, I here identify a separate struggle and an alternative evolutionary force. Owing to the abundant free energy in our universe, there is a struggle for supremacy that naturally rewards those that are first to invent novelties that allow exploitation of untapped resources. This natural reward comes in form of a temporary monopoly, which is granted to those who win a competitive race to innovate. By analogy to human economies, natural selection plays the role of nature's inventor, gradually fashioning inventions to the situation at hand, while natural reward plays the role of nature's entrepreneur, choosing which inventions to first disseminate to large markets. Natural reward leads to progress through a process of invention-conquest macroevolution, in which the dual forces of natural selection and natural reward create and disseminate major innovations. Over vast time frames, natural reward drives the advancement of life by a process of extinction-replacement megaevolution that releases constraints on progress and increases the innovativeness of life.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1903.09567

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Reading Yule in light of the history and present of macroevolution

2024-10-15 · Matt Pennell, Ailene MacPherson

Yule's 1925 paper introducing the branching model that bears his name was a landmark contribution to the biodiversity sciences. In his paper, Yule developed stochastic models to explain the observed distribution of speci…

Diversity

The Shape of Phylogenies Under Phase-Type Distributed Times to Speciation and Extinction

2021-10-08 · Albert Ch. Soewongsono, Barbara R. Holland, Małgorzata M. O'Reilly

Phylogenetic trees are widely used to understand the evolutionary history of organisms. Tree shapes provide information about macroevolutionary processes. However, macroevolutionary models are unreliable for inferring th…

A machine-compiled macroevolutionary history of Phanerozoic life

2014-06-11 · Shanan E. Peters, Ce Zhang, Miron Livny, Christopher Ré

Many aspects of macroevolutionary theory and our understanding of biotic responses to global environmental change derive from literature-based compilations of palaeontological data. Existing manually assembled databases …

Data IntegrationReading Comprehension

Bioenergetic trophic trade-offs determine mass-dependent extinction thresholds across the Cenozoic

2024-10-24 · Justin D. Yeakel, Matthew C. Hutchinson, Christopher P. Kempes, Paul L. Koch 외

Body size drives the energetic demands of organisms, constraining trophic interactions between species and playing a significant role in shaping the feasibility of species' populations in a community. On macroevolutionar…

Better Language Model-Based Judging Reward Modeling through Scaling Comprehension Boundaries

2025-08-25 · Meiling Ning, Zhongbao Zhang, Junda Ye, Jiabao Guo 외 arxiv

The emergence of LM-based judging reward modeling, represented by generative reward models, has successfully made reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF) efficient and scalable. To further advance this paradigm, …

Natural Language UnderstandingNatural Language InferenceReinforcement Learning