paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Neuroscience and Literacy: An Integrative View

2020-12-06 · George Ellis, Carole Bloch

Significant challenges exist globally regarding literacy teaching and learning. To address these challenges, key features of how the brain works should be taken into account. First, perception is an active process based in detection of errors in hierarchical predictions of sensory data and action outcomes. Reading is a particular case of this non-linear predictive process. Second, emotions play a key role in underlying cognitive functioning, including oral and written language. Negative emotions undermine motivation to learn. Third, there is not the fundamental difference between listening/speaking and reading/writing often alleged on the basis of evolutionary arguments. Both are socio-cultural practices that are driven through the communication imperative of the social brain. Fourth, both listening and reading are contextually occurring pyscho-social practices of understanding, shaped by current knowledge and cutlural contexts and practices. Fifth, the natural operation of the brain is not rule-based, as is supposed in the standard view of linguistics: it is prediction, based on statistical pattern recognition. This all calls into question narrow interpretations of the widely quoted "Simple View of Reading", which argues that explict decoding is the necessary route to comprehension. One of the two neural routes to reading does not involve such explicit decoding processes, and can be activated from the earliest years. An integrated view of brain function reflecting the non-linear contextual nature of the reading process implies that an ongoing focus on personal meaning and understanding from the very beginning provides positive conditions for learning all aspects of reading and writing.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2012.03240

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

AI Literacy in K-12 and Higher Education in the Wake of Generative AI: An Integrative Review

2025-02-27 · Xingjian Gu, Barbara J. Ericson

Even though AI literacy has emerged as a prominent education topic in the wake of generative AI, its definition remains vague. There is little consensus among researchers and practitioners on how to discuss and design AI…

The AI Literacy Heptagon: A Structured Approach to AI Literacy in Higher Education

2025-09-23 · Veronika Hackl, Alexandra Mueller, Maximilian Sailer arxiv

The integrative literature review addresses the conceptualization and implementation of AI Literacy (AIL) in Higher Education (HE) by examining recent research literature. Through an analysis of publications (2021-2024),…

Integrative neurocybernetic modeling in the era of large-scale neuroscience

2026-04-26 · Il Memming Park, Ayesha Vermani, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja, Juan Álvaro Gallego 외 arxiv

Large-scale neuroscience is generating rich datasets across animals, brain areas and behavioral contexts, yet our modeling efforts remains fragmented across isolated experiments. We argue that understanding behavior requ…

Knowledge Distillation

Bridging the gap between emotion and joint action

2021-08-13 · M. M. N. Bieńkiewicz, A. Smykovskyi, T. Olugbade, S. Janaqi 외

Our daily human life is filled with a myriad of joint action moments, be it children playing, adults working together (i.e., team sports), or strangers navigating through a crowd. Joint action brings individuals (and emb…

Can AI Reason Like an Urban Planner? Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Professional Judgment

2026-06-10 · Yijie Deng, He Zhu, Wen Wang, Junyou Su 외 arxiv

Problem, Research Strategy, and Findings: The rise of large language models (LLMs) raises a key question for urban planning: which forms of professional planning knowledge can AI replicate, and which still require human …