NiyamAI - An Intent-Bound AI Agent with Cryptographically Verifiable Guardrails using Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Autonomous LLM agents with tool execution capabilities introduce severe security risks through prompt injection, goal hijacking, and unauthorized action invocation. Existing guardrails rely on unverified, host local software filters system prompts, semantic classifiers, policy engines that share the execution environment of the untrusted agent, offering no guarantee to an external observer that a safety policy was correctly evaluated. A compromised host produces no evidence of its own failure. This paper presents NiyamAI, an intent bound runtime guardrail architecture providing cryptographically verifiable execution integrity for autonomous agents. At session initialization, permitted tools and operational constraints are sealed into an immutable Intent Contract under a SHA256 commitment. Every tool invocation is intercepted by a deterministic authority gate and classified by a dedicated neural Judge (11->8->2 feedforward network). For each authorized action, NiyamAI generates a succinct zkSNARK proof certifying correct policy evaluation under the committed contract; execution proceeds only after that proof verifies. Across 2,000 AgentSafetyBench scenarios under 5fold stratified crossvalidation with out of fold scoring, NiyamAI achieves 88.8% F1 at a 1.0% false positive rate (bootstrap 95% CI [85.5%, 92.1%]), against 66.8% for Llama Prompt Guard 2, 46.2% for GPTOSSSafeguard, and 40.4% for NeMo Guardrails; McNemar's exact test confirms each margin at p < 0.0001. Proof generation adds 1.7 s per approved action, verification 51 ms, with an 18.6 KB proof verifiable by any third party without access to model parameters. We further subject NiyamAI's own enforcement mechanism to 18 adversarial vectors across six classes, disclosing two implementation vulnerabilities identified and remediated during development.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
OpenKedge: Governing Agentic Mutation with Execution-Bound Safety and Evidence Chains
The rise of autonomous AI agents exposes a fundamental flaw in API-centric architectures: probabilistic systems directly execute state mutations without sufficient context, coordination, or safety guarantees. We introduc…
Secure Autonomous Agent Payments: Verifying Authenticity and Intent in a Trustless Environment
Artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly capable of initiating financial transactions on behalf of users or other agents. This evolution introduces a fundamental challenge: verifying both the authenticity of …
SS-ZKR: Spatial-Semantic Zero-Knowledge Routing for Privacy-Preserving Multi-Agent Collaboration
Foundational agent interoperability standards, notably the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol and the Model Context Protocol (MCP), have advanced multi-agent system communication, and complementary identity frameworks leverag…
Toward cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: A security hypothesis, preliminary formal model, and proof-of-concept implementation
Autonomous AI agents increasingly execute actions, invoke tools, and operate on protected resources with limited human oversight. Existing authentication and authorization mechanisms establish identity and delegate autho…
Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
Autonomous AI agents increasingly perform consequential actions on behalf of human principals, including financial transactions, external communications, and enterprise workflows. Existing agent infrastructure relies on …