paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

No Cost Likelihood Manipulation at Test Time for Making Better Mistakes in Deep Networks

2021-04-01 · Shyamgopal Karthik, Ameya Prabhu, Puneet K. Dokania, Vineet Gandhi

There has been increasing interest in building deep hierarchy-aware classifiers that aim to quantify and reduce the severity of mistakes, and not just reduce the number of errors. The idea is to exploit the label hierarchy (e.g., the WordNet ontology) and consider graph distances as a proxy for mistake severity. Surprisingly, on examining mistake-severity distributions of the top-1 prediction, we find that current state-of-the-art hierarchy-aware deep classifiers do not always show practical improvement over the standard cross-entropy baseline in making better mistakes. The reason for the reduction in average mistake-severity can be attributed to the increase in low-severity mistakes, which may also explain the noticeable drop in their accuracy. To this end, we use the classical Conditional Risk Minimization (CRM) framework for hierarchy-aware classification. Given a cost matrix and a reliable estimate of likelihoods (obtained from a trained network), CRM simply amends mistakes at inference time; it needs no extra hyperparameters and requires adding just a few lines of code to the standard cross-entropy baseline. It significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art and consistently obtains large reductions in the average hierarchical distance of top-$k$ predictions across datasets, with very little loss in accuracy. CRM, because of its simplicity, can be used with any off-the-shelf trained model that provides reliable likelihood estimates.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2104.00795

Code (1)

sgk98/CRM-Better-Mistakes 공식 구현 pytorch

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Ex-post moral hazard and manipulation-proof contracts

2021-12-13 · Jean-Gabriel Lauzier

We examine the trade-off between the provision of incentives to exert costly effort (ex-ante moral hazard) and the incentives needed to prevent the agent from manipulating the profit observed by the principal (ex-post mo…

Wald-Kernel: Learning to Aggregate Information for Sequential Inference

2015-08-31 · Diyan Teng, Emre Ertin

Sequential hypothesis testing is a desirable decision making strategy in any time sensitive scenario. Compared with fixed sample-size testing, sequential testing is capable of achieving identical probability of error req…

Decision MakingTwo-sample testing

Update-Free On-Policy Steering via Verifiers

2026-03-10 · Maria Attarian, Ian Vyse, Claas Voelcker, Jasper Gerigk 외 arxiv

In recent years, Behavior Cloning (BC) has become one of the most prevalent methods for learning manipulation from human demonstrations. Despite their successes, BC policies are often brittle and struggle with precise ma…

Addressing Strategic Manipulation Disparities in Fair Classification

2022-05-22 · Vijay Keswani, L. Elisa Celis

In real-world classification settings, such as loan application evaluation or content moderation on online platforms, individuals respond to classifier predictions by strategically updating their features to increase the…

ClassificationFairness

An Efficient Likelihood Ratio Test for Online Changepoint Detection in the Presence of Autocorrelation

2026-07-17 · Yuntang Fan, Paul Fearnhead, Idris A. Eckley, Gaetano Romano arxiv

Changepoint detection methods have seen considerable development in recent years, with online algorithms capable of identifying structural changes in streaming data in near real time. However, the majority of existing me…