paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

No more Reviewer #2: Subverting Automatic Paper-Reviewer Assignment using Adversarial Learning

2023-03-25 · Thorsten Eisenhofer, Erwin Quiring, Jonas Möller, Doreen Riepel, Thorsten Holz, Konrad Rieck

The number of papers submitted to academic conferences is steadily rising in many scientific disciplines. To handle this growth, systems for automatic paper-reviewer assignments are increasingly used during the reviewing process. These systems use statistical topic models to characterize the content of submissions and automate the assignment to reviewers. In this paper, we show that this automation can be manipulated using adversarial learning. We propose an attack that adapts a given paper so that it misleads the assignment and selects its own reviewers. Our attack is based on a novel optimization strategy that alternates between the feature space and problem space to realize unobtrusive changes to the paper. To evaluate the feasibility of our attack, we simulate the paper-reviewer assignment of an actual security conference (IEEE S&P) with 165 reviewers on the program committee. Our results show that we can successfully select and remove reviewers without access to the assignment system. Moreover, we demonstrate that the manipulated papers remain plausible and are often indistinguishable from benign submissions.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2303.14443

Code (1)

rub-syssec/adversarial-papers 공식 구현

Tasks

Topic Models

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

More efficient manual review of automatically transcribed tabular data

2023-06-28 · Bjørn-Richard Pedersen, Rigmor Katrine Johansen, Einar Holsbø, Hilde Sommerseth 외

Machine learning methods have proven useful in transcribing historical data. However, results from even highly accurate methods require manual verification and correction. Such manual review can be time-consuming and exp…

Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback

2026-01-14 · JungMin Yun, JuneHyoung Kwon, MiHyeon Kim, YoungBin Kim arxiv

The rapid expansion of AI research has intensified the Reviewer Gap, threatening the peer-review sustainability and perpetuating a cycle of low-quality evaluations. This position paper critiques existing LLM approaches t…

Reviewer Assignment Problem: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2023-04-01 · Meltem Aksoy, Seda Yanik, Mehmet Fatih Amasyali

Appropriate reviewer assignment significantly impacts the quality of proposal evaluation, as accurate and fair reviews are contingent on their assignment to relevant reviewers. The crucial task of assigning reviewers to …

Survey

Automatic Paper Reviewing with Heterogeneous Graph Reasoning over LLM-Simulated Reviewer-Author Debates

2025-11-11 · Shuaimin Li, Liyang Fan, Yufang Lin, Zeyang Li 외 arxiv

Existing paper review methods often rely on superficial manuscript features or directly on large language models (LLMs), which are prone to hallucinations, biased scoring, and limited reasoning capabilities. Moreover, th…

When Reviewers Lock Horn: Finding Disagreement in Scientific Peer Reviews

2023-10-28 · Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, Asif Ekbal

To this date, the efficacy of the scientific publishing enterprise fundamentally rests on the strength of the peer review process. The journal editor or the conference chair primarily relies on the expert reviewers' asse…