Not All Preferences are What You Need for Post-Training: Selective Alignment Strategy for Preference Optimization
Post-training alignment of large language models (LLMs) is a critical challenge, as not all tokens contribute equally to model performance. This paper introduces a selective alignment strategy that prioritizes high-impact tokens within preference pairs, leveraging token-level log-probability differences between the current policy and a reference model. By focusing on these informative tokens, our approach reduces computational overhead and enhances alignment fidelity. We further explore the role of reference model quality, demonstrating that stronger reference models significantly improve token selection accuracy and overall optimization effectiveness. Comprehensive experiments on benchmarks such as Arena-Hard and MT-Bench validate the superiority of our Selective-DPO method over standard DPO and distillation-based baselines. Our findings highlight the importance of token-level optimization and reference model selection in advancing preference alignment for LLMs. The code is available at https://github.com/Dongzhijin/SDPO.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
A Good Plan is Hard to Find: Aligning Models with Preferences is Misaligned with What Helps Users
To assist users in complex tasks, LLMs generate plans: step-by-step instructions towards a goal. While alignment methods aim to ensure LLM plans are helpful, they train (RLHF) or evaluate (ChatbotArena) on what users pre…
Question SimilarityCan A User Anticipate What Her Followers Want?
Whenever a social media user decides to share a story, she is typically pleased to receive likes, comments, shares, or, more generally, feedback from her followers. As a result, she may feel compelled to use the feedback…
Decision MakingSequential Decision MakingTwo-sample testingA Knowledge Driven Approach to Adaptive Assistance Using Preference Reasoning and Explanation
There is a need for socially assistive robots (SARs) to provide transparency in their behavior by explaining their reasoning. Additionally, the reasoning and explanation should represent the user's preferences and goals.…
Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AI
While a vast collection of explainable AI (XAI) algorithms have been developed in recent years, they are often criticized for significant gaps with how humans produce and consume explanations. As a result, current XAI te…
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Beyond expert users: agents should help users construct preferences, not just elicit them
Agents typically assume an expert user -- one with well-formed preferences about what they want -- and default to clarifying questions whenever the task is underspecified. We argue this assumption is unrealistic. Users o…