paper-with-me

Papers

OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search

2026-04-04 · Erhan Zhang, Yiqun Chen, Zechun Niu, Wei Yang, Xiaochi Wei, Yan Gao, Yi Wu, Yao Hu, Jiaxin Mao arxiv

Agentic search enables language models to solve knowledge-intensive tasks by adaptively acquiring external evidence over multiple steps. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a widely adopted training paradigm for search agents, yet outcome-only rewards are sparse and provide limited credit assignment for intermediate search actions. Existing process-reward methods therefore seek to densify supervision through proxy signals, external evaluators, or likelihood-based information gain. However, proxy rewards can deviate from the final outcome objective, while fixed evaluators can become stale as the search policy evolves, leading to unreliable process supervision. To address these challenges, we propose OASES, an Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Supervision framework for agentic search. OASES derives outcome-aligned process rewards by evaluating how well each intermediate search state supports answering the original question. It further co-trains the search policy and the state evaluator on policy, allowing the evaluator to adapt to evolving search behavior and provide more reliable process rewards. Experiments on five multi-hop QA benchmarks show that OASES consistently outperforms strong RL baselines, with further analyses confirming the benefits of outcome-aligned process rewards and search-evaluation co-training.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2604.03675

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Same Outcomes, Different Journeys: A Trace-Level Framework for Comparing Human and GUI-Agent Behavior in Production Search Systems

2026-04-09 · Maria Movin, Claudia Hauff, Aron Henriksson, Panagiotis Papapetrou arxiv

LLM-driven GUI agents are increasingly used in production systems to automate workflows and simulate users for evaluation and optimization. Yet most GUI-agent evaluations emphasize task success and provide limited eviden…

Latent Planning via Embedding Arithmetic: A Contrastive Approach to Strategic Reasoning

2025-11-12 · Andrew Hamara, Greg Hamerly, Pablo Rivas, Andrew C. Freeman arxiv

Planning in high-dimensional decision spaces is increasingly being studied through the lens of learned representations. Rather than training policies or value heads, we investigate whether planning can be carried out dir…

Contrastive Learning

Beyond Stochastic Exploration: What Makes Training Data Valuable for Agentic Search

2026-04-09 · Chuzhan Hao, Wenfeng Feng, Guochao Jiang, Guofeng Quan 외 arxiv

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become an effective approach for advancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through the strategic integration of external search engines. However, current RL-base…

Reinforcement LearningMathematical Reasoning

Towards evaluations-based safety cases for AI scheming

2024-10-29 · Mikita Balesni, Marius Hobbhahn, David Lindner, Alexander Meinke 외

We sketch how developers of frontier AI systems could construct a structured rationale -- a 'safety case' -- that an AI system is unlikely to cause catastrophic outcomes through scheming. Scheming is a potential threat m…

Preemptive Detection and Correction of Misaligned Actions in LLM Agents

2024-07-16 · Haishuo Fang, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych

Deploying LLM-based agents in real-life applications often faces a critical challenge: the misalignment between agents' behavior and user intent. Such misalignment may lead agents to unintentionally execute critical acti…

Action DetectionDecision Making