paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Ocasta: Clustering Configuration Settings For Error Recovery

2017-11-02 · Zhen Huang, David Lie

Effective machine-aided diagnosis and repair of configuration errors continues to elude computer systems designers. Most of the literature targets errors that can be attributed to a single erroneous configuration setting. However, a recent study found that a significant amount of configuration errors require fixing more than one setting together. To address this limitation, Ocasta statistically clusters dependent configuration settings based on the application's accesses to its configuration settings and utilizes the extracted clustering of configuration settings to fix configuration errors involving more than one configuration settings. Ocasta treats applications as black-boxes and only relies on the ability to observe application accesses to their configuration settings. We collected traces of real application usage from 24 Linux and 5 Windows desktops computers and found that Ocasta is able to correctly identify clusters with 88.6% accuracy. To demonstrate the effectiveness of Ocasta, we evaluated it on 16 real-world configuration errors of 11 Linux and Windows applications. Ocasta is able to successfully repair all evaluated configuration errors in 11 minutes on average and only requires the user to examine an average of 3 screenshots of the output of the application to confirm that the error is repaired. A user study we conducted shows that Ocasta is easy to use by both expert and non-expert users and is more efficient than manual configuration error troubleshooting.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1711.04030

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Clustering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Correcting Prompt Dependence in LLM Benchmarks: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model with Embedding-Space Clustering

2025-10-07 · Mary Llewellyn, Isobel Thornton, James Bishop, Annie Gray arxiv

LLM benchmarking metrics often misstate performance and uncertainty as they rely on two assumptions that frequently do not hold in practice: (i) a sufficient number of evaluations are available for classical inference, a…

Adversarial Robustness

WhatWorkedBench: Benchmarking Experimental Understanding in AI Agents

2026-09-23 · Jingjie Ning, Xueqi Li, Yibo Kong, Dongting Li hf

AI research agents need reliable knowledge of how their experiments change outcomes. We introduce WhatWorkedBench to measure experimental understanding, the accuracy of predictions about component changes after budgeted …

Iterative Algorithm for Discrete Structure Recovery

2019-11-04 · Chao Gao, Anderson Y. Zhang

We propose a general modeling and algorithmic framework for discrete structure recovery that can be applied to a wide range of problems. Under this framework, we are able to study the recovery of clustering labels, ranks…

Clusteringcompressed sensing

MDQEC-QAS: Meta-Decoding for Quantum Error Correction with Hardware-Aware VQC Search and Confidence-Gated Recovery

2026-07-12 · Prashant Kumar Choudhary, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique, Rajeev Singh arxiv

We propose a unified meta-decoding framework for quantum error correction that learns syndrome-to-recovery mappings across multiple stabilizer codes and noise settings, without requiring separate decoders for each config…

Robust Graph Learning from Noisy Data

2018-12-17 · Zhao Kang, Haiqi Pan, Steven C. H. Hoi, Zenglin Xu

Learning graphs from data automatically has shown encouraging performance on clustering and semisupervised learning tasks. However, real data are often corrupted, which may cause the learned graph to be inexact or unreli…

ClusteringGeneral Classificationgraph constructionGraph Learning+5