paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

On Detecting Some Defective Items in Group Testing

2023-06-27 · Nader H. Bshouty, Catherine A. Haddad-Zaknoon

Group testing is an approach aimed at identifying up to $d$ defective items among a total of $n$ elements. This is accomplished by examining subsets to determine if at least one defective item is present. In our study, we focus on the problem of identifying a subset of $\ell\leq d$ defective items. We develop upper and lower bounds on the number of tests required to detect $\ell$ defective items in both the adaptive and non-adaptive settings while considering scenarios where no prior knowledge of $d$ is available, and situations where an estimate of $d$ or at least some non-trivial upper bound on $d$ is available. When no prior knowledge on $d$ is available, we prove a lower bound of $ \Omega(\frac{\ell \log^2n}{\log \ell +\log\log n})$ tests in the randomized non-adaptive settings and an upper bound of $O(\ell \log^2 n)$ for the same settings. Furthermore, we demonstrate that any non-adaptive deterministic algorithm must ask $\Theta(n)$ tests, signifying a fundamental limitation in this scenario. For adaptive algorithms, we establish tight bounds in different scenarios. In the deterministic case, we prove a tight bound of $\Theta(\ell\log{(n/\ell)})$. Moreover, in the randomized settings, we derive a tight bound of $\Theta(\ell\log{(n/d)})$. When $d$, or at least some non-trivial estimate of $d$, is known, we prove a tight bound of $\Theta(d\log (n/d))$ for the deterministic non-adaptive settings, and $\Theta(\ell\log(n/d))$ for the randomized non-adaptive settings. In the adaptive case, we present an upper bound of $O(\ell \log (n/\ell))$ for the deterministic settings, and a lower bound of $\Omega(\ell\log(n/d)+\log n)$. Additionally, we establish a tight bound of $\Theta(\ell \log(n/d))$ for the randomized adaptive settings.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2307.04822

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Matrix Completion in Group Testing: Bounds and Simulations

2025-01-23 · Trung-Khang Tran, Thach V. Bui

The main goal of group testing is to identify a small number of defective items in a large population of items. A test on a subset of items is positive if the subset contains at least one defective item and negative othe…

Matrix Completion

A Probably Approximately Correct Analysis of Group Testing Algorithms

2024-11-30 · Sameera Bharadwaja H., Chandra R. Murthy

We consider the problem of identifying the defectives from a population of items via a non-adaptive group testing framework with a random pooling-matrix design. We analyze the sufficient number of tests needed for approx…

Bounds for the Number of Tests in Non-Adaptive Randomized Algorithms for Group Testing

2019-11-05 · Nader H. Bshouty, George Haddad, Catherine A. Haddad-Zaknoon

We study the group testing problem with non-adaptive randomized algorithms. Several models have been discussed in the literature to determine how to randomly choose the tests. For a model ${\cal M}$, let $m_{\cal M}(n,d)…

Verifiable Deep Quantitative Group Testing

2025-12-08 · Shreyas Jayant Grampurohit, Satish Mulleti, Ajit Rajwade arxiv

We present a neural network-based framework for solving the quantitative group testing (QGT) problem that achieves both high decoding accuracy and structural verifiability. In QGT, the objective is to identify a small su…

Non-adaptive Group Testing on Graphs

2015-11-30 · Hamid Kameli

Grebinski and Kucherov (1998) and Alon et al. (2004-2005) study the problem of learning a hidden graph for some especial cases, such as hamiltonian cycle, cliques, stars, and matchings. This problem is motivated by probl…

LEMMA