On Fair Virtual Conference Scheduling: Achieving Equitable Participant and Speaker Satisfaction
The (COVID-19) pandemic-induced restrictions on travel and social gatherings have prompted most conference organizers to move their events online. However, in contrast to physical conferences, virtual conferences face a challenge in efficiently scheduling talks, accounting for the availability of participants from different time-zones as well as their interests in attending different talks. In such settings, a natural objective for the conference organizers would be to maximize some global welfare measure, such as the total expected audience participation across all talks. However, we show that optimizing for global welfare could result in a schedule that is unfair to the stakeholders, i.e., the individual utilities for participants and speakers can be highly unequal. To address the fairness concerns, we formally define fairness notions for participants and speakers, and subsequently derive suitable fairness objectives for them. We show that the welfare and fairness objectives can be in conflict with each other, and there is a need to maintain a balance between these objective while caring for them simultaneously. Thus, we propose a joint optimization framework that allows conference organizers to design talk schedules that balance (i.e., allow trade-offs) between global welfare, participant fairness and the speaker fairness objectives. We show that the optimization problem can be solved using integer linear programming, and empirically evaluate the necessity and benefits of such joint optimization approach in virtual conference scheduling.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
FairnessSchedulingMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Scheduling Virtual Conferences Fairly: Achieving Equitable Participant and Speaker Satisfaction
Recently, almost all conferences have moved to virtual mode due to the pandemic-induced restrictions on travel and social gathering. Contrary to in-person conferences, virtual conferences face the challenge of efficientl…
FairnessSchedulingEquity and Fairness of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing
We consider the equity and fairness of curricula derived from Knowledge Tracing models. We begin by defining a unifying notion of an equitable tutoring system as a system that achieves maximum possible knowledge in minim…
FairnessKnowledge TracingLocality-aware Fair Scheduling in LLM Serving
Large language model (LLM) inference workload dominates a wide variety of modern AI applications, ranging from multi-turn conversation to document analysis. Balancing fairness and efficiency is critical for managing dive…
FairnessLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model+1Impact of Data Distribution on Fairness Guarantees in Equitable Deep Learning
We present a comprehensive theoretical framework analyzing the relationship between data distributions and fairness guarantees in equitable deep learning. Our work establishes novel theoretical bounds that explicitly acc…
FairnessFERI: A Multitask-based Fairness Achieving Algorithm with Applications to Fair Organ Transplantation
Liver transplantation often faces fairness challenges across subgroups defined by sensitive attributes such as age group, gender, and race/ethnicity. Machine learning models for outcome prediction can introduce additiona…
Fairness