paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

On Generalization Bounds for Projective Clustering

2023-10-13 · NeurIPS 2023 11

Given a set of points, clustering consists of finding a partition of a point set into $k$ clusters such that the center to which a point is assigned is as close as possible. Most commonly, centers are points themselves, which leads to the famous $k$-median and $k$-means objectives. One may also choose centers to be $j$ dimensional subspaces, which gives rise to subspace clustering. In this paper, we consider learning bounds for these problems. That is, given a set of $n$ samples $P$ drawn independently from some unknown, but fixed distribution $\mathcal{D}$, how quickly does a solution computed on $P$ converge to the optimal clustering of $\mathcal{D}$? We give several near optimal results. In particular, For center-based objectives, we show a convergence rate of $\tilde{O}\left(\sqrt{{k}/{n}}\right)$. This matches the known optimal bounds of [Fefferman, Mitter, and Narayanan, Journal of the Mathematical Society 2016] and [Bartlett, Linder, and Lugosi, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998] for $k$-means and extends it to other important objectives such as $k$-median. For subspace clustering with $j$-dimensional subspaces, we show a convergence rate of $\tilde{O}\left(\sqrt{\frac{kj^2}{n}}\right)$. These are the first provable bounds for most of these problems. For the specific case of projective clustering, which generalizes $k$-means, we show a convergence rate of $\Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{kj}{n}}\right)$ is necessary, thereby proving that the bounds from [Fefferman, Mitter, and Narayanan, Journal of the Mathematical Society 2016] are essentially optimal.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2310.09127

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

ClusteringGeneralization Bounds

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

New Coresets for Projective Clustering and Applications

2022-03-08 · Murad Tukan, Xuan Wu, Samson Zhou, Vladimir Braverman 외

$(j,k)$-projective clustering is the natural generalization of the family of $k$-clustering and $j$-subspace clustering problems. Given a set of points $P$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the goal is to find $k$ flats of dimension $j…

Clusteringregression

Recurrent models and lower bounds for projective syntactic decoding

2019-06-01 · NAACL 2019 6 · Natalie Schluter

The current state-of-the-art in neural graph-based parsing uses only approximate decoding at the training phase. In this paper aim to understand this result better. We show how recurrent models can carry out projective m…

Projective simulation with generalization

2015-04-09 · Alexey A. Melnikov, Adi Makmal, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Briegel

The ability to generalize is an important feature of any intelligent agent. Not only because it may allow the agent to cope with large amounts of data, but also because in some environments, an agent with no generalizati…

Reinforcement Learning

Tropical Support Vector Machines: Evaluations and Extension to Function Spaces

2021-01-27 · Ruriko Yoshida, Misaki Takamori, Hideyuki Matsumoto, Keiji Miura

Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are one of the most popular supervised learning models to classify using a hyperplane in an Euclidean space. Similar to SVMs, tropical SVMs classify data points using a tropical hyperplane …

Improving Coverage and Runtime Complexity for Exact Inference in Non-Projective Transition-Based Dependency Parsers

2018-04-27 · NAACL 2018 6 · Tianze Shi, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, Lillian Lee

We generalize Cohen, G\'omez-Rodr\'iguez, and Satta's (2011) parser to a family of non-projective transition-based dependency parsers allowing polynomial-time exact inference. This includes novel parsers with better cove…