paper-with-me

Papers

On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification

2026-08-18 · Qinyuan Ye, Yu Li, Yada Pruksachatkun, Jiaxin Zhang, Chien-Sheng Wu arxiv

Memory-based self-improving agents--those that learn from an online stream of tasks and improve over time by maintaining a textual memory bank--have shown great promise in recent literature. However, the reliability aspects of these methods have been critically overlooked. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive re-evaluation of two memory-based methods, broadening the scope of evaluation along two axes: (1) including multiple runs to quantify variance, and (2) randomly shuffling the tasks to investigate the effect of task order. Through these experiments, we make two observations that expose the fragility of current methods: First, agent evaluation is inherently noisy in complex environments and on multi-step tasks, and stacking a self-improving loop on top can further amplify this noise. Second, the agent's improvement is highly dependent on task order. Prior works often adopt default orderings that impose an implicit curriculum, acting as a hidden prerequisite for success. To better understand this fragility, we manually examine the agents' memory and hypothesize that task and environment underspecification contribute to this fragility. We validate this hypothesis by incorporating information that enables better specification, such as detailed rubrics and environment feedback, into the memory construction process. While this added information partially closes the performance degradation in previous experiments, significant gaps still remain, suggesting that other uncharacterized factors contribute to this fragility. Looking ahead, our work advocates for more rigorous evaluation protocols for self-improving agents by reporting results across multiple runs and stress-testing them under challenging conditions. Moreover, our findings on underspecification call for systems and interfaces that enable effective human oversight, preventing agents from failing in unforeseeable ways.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2608.18066

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Optimal Order of Multi-Agent and General Many-Body Systems

2026-06-18 · Jake J. Xia arxiv

This paper develops a general framework for analyzing multi-agent systems with feedback loops between agents actions and collective observations. The framework is built on two fundamental agent-level variables: power, wh…

Semantic Invariance in Agentic AI

2026-03-13 · I. de Zarzà, J. de Curtò, Jordi Cabot, Pietro Manzoni 외 arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly serve as autonomous reasoning agents in decision support, scientific problem-solving, and multi-agent coordination systems. However, deploying LLM agents in consequential applica…

Semantic Similarity

One Goal, Many Commands: Characterizing Denylist Fragility in AI Agents

2026-06-14 · Chuyang Chen, Zhiqiang Lin arxiv

The adoption of AI agents is increasing rapidly. Terminal AI agents, i.e., AI agents that run in terminal environments, are a widely used type of AI agents. Terminal AI agents rely heavily on shell command execution to i…

Can We Test Consciousness Theories on AI? Ablations, Markers, and Robustness

2025-12-22 · Yin Jun Phua arxiv

The search for reliable indicators of consciousness has fragmented into competing theoretical camps (Global Workspace Theory (GWT), Integrated Information Theory (IIT), and Higher-Order Theories (HOT)), each proposing di…

Efficient Equivariant Transformer for Self-Driving Agent Modeling

2026-04-01 · Scott Xu, Dian Chen, Kelvin Wong, Chris Zhang 외 arxiv

Accurately modeling agent behaviors is an important task in self-driving. It is also a task with many symmetries, such as equivariance to the order of agents and objects in the scene or equivariance to arbitrary roto-tra…