paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

On the Necessity of Multi-Domain Explanation: An Uncertainty Principle Approach for Deep Time Series Models

2025-06-03 · Shahbaz Rezaei, Avishai Halev, Xin Liu

A prevailing approach to explain time series models is to generate attribution in time domain. A recent development in time series XAI is the concept of explanation spaces, where any model trained in the time domain can be interpreted with any existing XAI method in alternative domains, such as frequency. The prevailing approach is to present XAI attributions either in the time domain or in the domain where the attribution is most sparse. In this paper, we demonstrate that in certain cases, XAI methods can generate attributions that highlight fundamentally different features in the time and frequency domains that are not direct counterparts of one another. This suggests that both domains' attributions should be presented to achieve a more comprehensive interpretation. Thus it shows the necessity of multi-domain explanation. To quantify when such cases arise, we introduce the uncertainty principle (UP), originally developed in quantum mechanics and later studied in harmonic analysis and signal processing, to the XAI literature. This principle establishes a lower bound on how much a signal can be simultaneously localized in both the time and frequency domains. By leveraging this concept, we assess whether attributions in the time and frequency domains violate this bound, indicating that they emphasize distinct features. In other words, UP provides a sufficient condition that the time and frequency domain explanations do not match and, hence, should be both presented to the end user. We validate the effectiveness of this approach across various deep learning models, XAI methods, and a wide range of classification and forecasting datasets. The frequent occurrence of UP violations across various datasets and XAI methods highlights the limitations of existing approaches that focus solely on time-domain explanations. This underscores the need for multi-domain explanations as a new paradigm.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2506.03267

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Time Series

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Ensured: Explanations for Decreasing the Epistemic Uncertainty in Predictions

2024-10-07 · Helena Löfström, Tuwe Löfström, Johan Hallberg Szabadvary

This paper addresses a significant gap in explainable AI: the necessity of interpreting epistemic uncertainty in model explanations. Although current methods mainly focus on explaining predictions, with some including un…

Logic Conditionals, Supervenience, and Selection Tasks

2019-07-15 · Giovanni Sileno

Principles of cognitive economy would require that concepts about objects, properties and relations should be introduced only if they simplify the conceptualisation of a domain. Unexpectedly, classic logic conditionals, …

CONFEX: Uncertainty-Aware Counterfactual Explanations with Conformal Guarantees

2025-10-22 · Aman Bilkhoo, Mehran Hosseini, Milad Kazemi, Nicola Paoletti arxiv

Counterfactual explanations (CFXs) provide human-understandable justifications for model predictions, enabling actionable recourse and enhancing interpretability. To be reliable, CFXs must avoid regions of high predictiv…

Regularizing Explanations in Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks

2021-04-29 · Yanzhe Bekkemoen, Helge Langseth

Neural networks are powerful function approximators with tremendous potential in learning complex distributions. However, they are prone to overfitting on spurious patterns. Bayesian inference provides a principled way t…

Bayesian InferenceClassificationExplainable artificial intelligenceFeature Importance+1

Concerning Uncertainty -- A Systematic Survey of Uncertainty-Aware XAI

2026-03-27 · Helena Löfström, Tuwe Löfström, Anders Hjort, Fatima Rabia Yapicioglu arxiv

This paper surveys uncertainty-aware explainable artificial intelligence (UAXAI), examining how uncertainty is incorporated into explanatory pipelines and how such methods are evaluated. Across the literature, three recu…