Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negatives
Ranking has always been one of the top concerns in information retrieval researches. For decades, the lexical matching signal has dominated the ad-hoc retrieval process, but solely using this signal in retrieval may cause the vocabulary mismatch problem. In recent years, with the development of representation learning techniques, many researchers turn to Dense Retrieval (DR) models for better ranking performance. Although several existing DR models have already obtained promising results, their performance improvement heavily relies on the sampling of training examples. Many effective sampling strategies are not efficient enough for practical usage, and for most of them, there still lacks theoretical analysis in how and why performance improvement happens. To shed light on these research questions, we theoretically investigate different training strategies for DR models and try to explain why hard negative sampling performs better than random sampling. Through the analysis, we also find that there are many potential risks in static hard negative sampling, which is employed by many existing training methods. Therefore, we propose two training strategies named a Stable Training Algorithm for dense Retrieval (STAR) and a query-side training Algorithm for Directly Optimizing Ranking pErformance (ADORE), respectively. STAR improves the stability of DR training process by introducing random negatives. ADORE replaces the widely-adopted static hard negative sampling method with a dynamic one to directly optimize the ranking performance. Experimental results on two publicly available retrieval benchmark datasets show that either strategy gains significant improvements over existing competitive baselines and a combination of them leads to the best performance.
Code (4)
Tasks
Information RetrievalmodelRepresentation LearningRetrievalSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
BiCA: Effective Biomedical Dense Retrieval with Citation-Aware Hard Negatives
Hard negatives are essential for training effective retrieval models. Hard-negative mining typically relies on ranking documents using cross-encoders or static embedding models based on similarity metrics such as cosine …
Domain AdaptationMitigating the Impact of False Negatives in Dense Retrieval with Contrastive Confidence Regularization
In open-domain Question Answering (QA), dense retrieval is crucial for finding relevant passages for answer generation. Typically, contrastive learning is used to train a retrieval model that maps passages and queries to…
Answer GenerationContrastive LearningOpen-Domain Question AnsweringQuestion Answering+2Reduce Catastrophic Forgetting of Dense Retrieval Training with Teleportation Negatives
In this paper, we investigate the instability in the standard dense retrieval training, which iterates between model training and hard negative selection using the being-trained model. We show the catastrophic forgetting…
RetrievalSyNeg: LLM-Driven Synthetic Hard-Negatives for Dense Retrieval
The performance of Dense retrieval (DR) is significantly influenced by the quality of negative sampling. Traditional DR methods primarily depend on naive negative sampling techniques or on mining hard negatives through e…
AttributeRetrievalRRRA: Resampling and Reranking through a Retriever Adapter
In dense retrieval, effective training hinges on selecting high quality hard negatives while avoiding false negatives. Recent methods apply heuristics based on positive document scores to identify hard negatives, improvi…