paper-with-me

Papers

Option-ID Based Elimination For Multiple Choice Questions

2025-01-25 · Zhenhao Zhu, Bulou Liu, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu

Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a popular and important task for evaluating large language models (LLMs). Based on common strategies people use when answering MCQs, the process of elimination (PoE) has been proposed as an effective problem-solving method. Existing PoE methods typically either have LLMs directly identify incorrect options or score options and replace lower-scoring ones with [MASK]. However, both methods suffer from inapplicability or suboptimal performance. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel option-ID based PoE ($\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}$). $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}$ critically incorporates a debiasing technique to counteract LLMs token bias, enhancing robustness over naive ID-based elimination. It features two strategies: $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{log}}$, which eliminates options whose IDs have log probabilities below the average threshold, and $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{seq}}$, which iteratively removes the option with the lowest ID probability. We conduct extensive experiments with 6 different LLMs on 4 diverse datasets. The results demonstrate that $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}$, especially $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{log}}$, significantly improves zero-shot and few-shot MCQs performance, particularly in datasets with more options. Our analyses demonstrate that $\text{PoE}_{\text{ID}}^{\text{log}}$ enhances the LLMs' confidence in selecting the correct option, and the option elimination strategy outperforms methods relying on [MASK] replacement. We further investigate the limitations of LLMs in directly identifying incorrect options, which stem from their inherent deficiencies.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2501.15175

Code (1)

zzh-thu-22/poe_id 공식 구현 pytorch

Tasks

Multiple-choice

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions

2019-04-04 · ICLR 2018 1 · Soham Parikh, Ananya B. Sai, Preksha Nema, Mitesh M. Khapra

The task of Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions, requires a human (or machine) to read a given passage, question pair and select one of the n given options. The current state of the art model for this ta…

Multiple-choiceReading Comprehension

Rethinking Multiple-Choice Questions for RLVR: Unlocking Potential via Distractor Design

2026-03-13 · Xu Guo, Qiming Ge, Jian Tong, Kedi Chen 외 arxiv

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. When applied to RLVR, Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) offer a scalable source of verifiab…

Reinforcement Learning

Evaluating the Rationale Understanding of Critical Reasoning in Logical Reading Comprehension

2023-11-30 · Akira Kawabata, Saku Sugawara

To precisely evaluate a language model's capability for logical reading comprehension, we present a dataset for testing the understanding of the rationale behind critical reasoning. For questions taken from an existing m…

Multiple-choiceReading Comprehension

POE: Process of Elimination for Multiple Choice Reasoning

2023-10-24 · Chenkai Ma, Xinya Du

Language models (LMs) are capable of conducting in-context learning for multiple choice reasoning tasks, but the options in these tasks are treated equally. As humans often first eliminate wrong options before picking th…

In-Context LearningLogical ReasoningMultiple-choice

It's Not Easy Being Wrong: Large Language Models Struggle with Process of Elimination Reasoning

2023-11-13 · Nishant Balepur, Shramay Palta, Rachel Rudinger

Chain-of-thought (COT) prompting can help large language models (LLMs) reason toward correct answers, but its efficacy in reasoning toward incorrect answers is unexplored. This process of elimination (PoE), when used wit…

Multiple-choice