Oyster-I: Beyond Refusal -- Constructive Safety Alignment for Responsible Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) typically deploy safety mechanisms to prevent harmful content generation. Most current approaches focus narrowly on risks posed by malicious actors, often framing risks as adversarial events and relying on defensive refusals. However, in real-world settings, risks also come from non-malicious users seeking help while under psychological distress (e.g., self-harm intentions). In such cases, the model's response can strongly influence the user's next actions. Simple refusals may lead them to repeat, escalate, or move to unsafe platforms, creating worse outcomes. We introduce Constructive Safety Alignment (CSA), a human-centric paradigm that protects against malicious misuse while actively guiding vulnerable users toward safe and helpful results. Implemented in Oyster-I (Oy1), CSA combines game-theoretic anticipation of user reactions, fine-grained risk boundary discovery, and interpretable reasoning control, turning safety into a trust-building process. Oy1 achieves state-of-the-art safety among open models while retaining high general capabilities. On our Constructive Benchmark, it shows strong constructive engagement, close to GPT-5, and unmatched robustness on the Strata-Sword jailbreak dataset, nearing GPT-o1 levels. By shifting from refusal-first to guidance-first safety, CSA redefines the model-user relationship, aiming for systems that are not just safe, but meaningfully helpful. We release Oy1, code, and the benchmark to support responsible, user-centered AI.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Oyster-II: Reinforcement Learning for Constructive Safety Alignment in Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse applications, yet ensuring their simultaneous safety, helpfulness, and trustworthiness remains a persistent challenge. Conventional re…
Reinforcement LearningALTSTEER: Selective Safety Steering for Moving Beyond Hard Refusals to Constructive Alternatives
Safety alignment is essential for deploying large language models, requiring systems to prevent harmful compliance while preserving helpfulness on benign requests. Activation steering offers a training-free inference-tim…
From Rogue to Safe AI: The Role of Explicit Refusals in Aligning LLMs with International Humanitarian Law
Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used across sectors, yet their alignment with International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is not well understood. This study evaluates eight leading LLMs on their ability to refuse prompt…
HumanitarianDeactivating Refusal Triggers: Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in Safety Alignment
Safety alignment aims to ensure that large language models (LLMs) refuse harmful requests by post-training on harmful queries paired with refusal answers. Although safety alignment is widely adopted in industry, the over…
DDOR: Delta Debugging for Explainable Overrefusal Testing and Repair
While safety alignment and guardrails help large language models (LLMs) avoid harmful outputs, they can also induce overrefusal, i.e., unwarranted rejection of benign queries that merely appear risky. We present DDOR (De…