Pairwise Reference Alignment as a Model-Level Ordinal Observable
Pairwise preference data is widely used in language-model evaluation and alignment, often for model ranking, reward modeling, or preference optimization. This note formulates a more basic measurement question: given a reference distribution of pairwise preferences, what model-level quantity is estimated when we test whether a model ranks preferred responses above rejected responses? We define pairwise reference alignment as an ordinal observable induced by a model scoring function. Given a reference pair distribution $P_{\mathrm{pair}}$ over triples $(x,y^+,y^-)$, and a scalar model score $S_M(x,y)$, we define the alignment observable as the probability that the model-induced ordering agrees with the reference preference ordering. We further define a centered order-parameter-like statistic and discuss a margin-based extension. The resulting quantities admit simple finite-sample estimators and concentration bounds under independent sampling assumptions. This note does not introduce a new benchmark. It provides a conceptual and statistical formulation for pairwise reference alignment, clarifies the role of the reference pair distribution, and distinguishes the general ordinal observable from scoring choices such as normalized log-probability or energy-based scores. We also provide an initial empirical study on Qwen2.5 models and RewardBench, where the proposed statistics increase with model size and instruction tuning and vary across reference-pair subsets as predicted by the formulation.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Ordinal Preference Optimization: Aligning Human Preferences via NDCG
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with diverse human preferences is a pivotal technique for controlling model behaviors and enhancing generation quality. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), Direct Pref…
Information RetrievalThe Sign Estimator: LLM Alignment in the Face of Choice Heterogeneity
Traditional LLM alignment methods are vulnerable to heterogeneity in human preferences. Fitting a naïve probabilistic model to pairwise comparison data (say over prompt-completion pairs) yields an inconsistent estimate o…
Binary ClassificationLearning-to-Rank Meets Language: Boosting Language-Driven Ordering Alignment for Ordinal Classification
We present a novel language-driven ordering alignment method for ordinal classification. The labels in ordinal classification contain additional ordering relations, making them prone to overfitting when relying solely on…
Age EstimationClassificationLearning-To-RankOrdinal ClassificationRobust Ordinal VAE: Employing Noisy Pairwise Comparisons for Disentanglement
Recent work by Locatello et al. (2018) has shown that an inductive bias is required to disentangle factors of interest in Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Motivated by a real-world problem, we propose a setting where such …
DisentanglementInductive BiasBeyond Ordinal Preferences: Why Alignment Needs Cardinal Human Feedback
Alignment techniques for LLMs rely on optimizing preference-based objectives -- where these preferences are typically elicited as ordinal, binary choices between responses. Recent work has focused on improving label qual…