paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Pairwise Reference Alignment as a Model-Level Ordinal Observable

2026-05-29 · Mujing Li arxiv

Pairwise preference data is widely used in language-model evaluation and alignment, often for model ranking, reward modeling, or preference optimization. This note formulates a more basic measurement question: given a reference distribution of pairwise preferences, what model-level quantity is estimated when we test whether a model ranks preferred responses above rejected responses? We define pairwise reference alignment as an ordinal observable induced by a model scoring function. Given a reference pair distribution $P_{\mathrm{pair}}$ over triples $(x,y^+,y^-)$, and a scalar model score $S_M(x,y)$, we define the alignment observable as the probability that the model-induced ordering agrees with the reference preference ordering. We further define a centered order-parameter-like statistic and discuss a margin-based extension. The resulting quantities admit simple finite-sample estimators and concentration bounds under independent sampling assumptions. This note does not introduce a new benchmark. It provides a conceptual and statistical formulation for pairwise reference alignment, clarifies the role of the reference pair distribution, and distinguishes the general ordinal observable from scoring choices such as normalized log-probability or energy-based scores. We also provide an initial empirical study on Qwen2.5 models and RewardBench, where the proposed statistics increase with model size and instruction tuning and vary across reference-pair subsets as predicted by the formulation.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.30758

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Ordinal Preference Optimization: Aligning Human Preferences via NDCG

2024-10-06 · Yang Zhao, Yixin Wang, Mingzhang Yin

Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with diverse human preferences is a pivotal technique for controlling model behaviors and enhancing generation quality. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), Direct Pref…

Information Retrieval

The Sign Estimator: LLM Alignment in the Face of Choice Heterogeneity

2025-10-28 · Ali Aouad, Aymane El Gadarri, Vivek F. Farias arxiv

Traditional LLM alignment methods are vulnerable to heterogeneity in human preferences. Fitting a naïve probabilistic model to pairwise comparison data (say over prompt-completion pairs) yields an inconsistent estimate o…

Binary Classification

Learning-to-Rank Meets Language: Boosting Language-Driven Ordering Alignment for Ordinal Classification

2023-06-24 · NeurIPS 2023 11 · Rui Wang, Peipei Li, Huaibo Huang, Chunshui Cao 외

We present a novel language-driven ordering alignment method for ordinal classification. The labels in ordinal classification contain additional ordering relations, making them prone to overfitting when relying solely on…

Age EstimationClassificationLearning-To-RankOrdinal Classification

Robust Ordinal VAE: Employing Noisy Pairwise Comparisons for Disentanglement

2019-10-14 · Junxiang Chen, Kayhan Batmanghelich

Recent work by Locatello et al. (2018) has shown that an inductive bias is required to disentangle factors of interest in Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Motivated by a real-world problem, we propose a setting where such …

DisentanglementInductive Bias

Beyond Ordinal Preferences: Why Alignment Needs Cardinal Human Feedback

2025-08-11 · Parker Whitfill, Stewy Slocum arxiv

Alignment techniques for LLMs rely on optimizing preference-based objectives -- where these preferences are typically elicited as ordinal, binary choices between responses. Recent work has focused on improving label qual…