PaperGym: Rubric-Centered Evolution for Research-Plan Generation
Research planning is the decisive capability of AI scientists. Yet a research plan admits no verifiable answer, so reinforcement learning lacks the environment it requires: tasks paired with a critic. Rubrics extracted from scientific papers can supply the critic. Existing pipelines, however, draw the question and the criteria from the same content, so the reward can be earned by paraphrase. The rubric is further compressed into a single scalar per rollout. We introduce PaperGym, a unified framework that turns each research paper into a complete training environment. PaperGym exploits the structure of a paper: the question is synthesized from the research goal and background, while the criteria are derived from the method and experiments. The criteria span methodological innovation and experimental design, and criterion leakage falls to 3.7%, versus 11.90% to 34.10% in existing datasets. Training uses the rubric twice: first as privileged context for OPSD's self-teacher, then as the reward for GRPO. Across Qwen3-1.7B/4B/8B, this schedule outperforms supervised fine-tuning, either stage alone, and the reverse ordering, improving five-benchmark averages by +5.6, +5.0, and +4.8 points. With the recipe held fixed, models trained on PaperGym-20k win 58.1% of three-way comparisons, against 28.2% for RubricHub Science. The trained Qwen3-8B reaches 73.48 on ResearchQA, above the far larger Kimi K2.6. We release the pipeline, the 20,000-instance corpus PaperGym-20k, and the benchmarks PaperGym-Innov and PaperGym-Design.
Code (4)
Tasks
Reinforcement LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Read, Grep, and Synthesize: Diagnosing Cross-Domain Seed Exposure for LLM Research Ideation
The discovery of novel methodologies for emerging problems is a continuing cycle in ML, often driven by the migration of techniques across domains. Building on this observation, we ask whether current LLM ideation system…
RubricEM: Meta-RL with Rubric-guided Policy Decomposition beyond Verifiable Rewards
Training deep research agents, namely systems that plan, search, evaluate evidence, and synthesize long-form reports, pushes reinforcement learning beyond the regime of verifiable rewards. Their outputs lack ground-truth…
Reinforcement LearningSERPO: Self-Evolving Rubric Policy Optimization for Open-Ended Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) enables language models to self-evolve at inference time without labeled feedback. Existing methods rely on answer voting and therefore do not extend naturally to open-ended genera…
Reinforcement LearningCoReflect: A Reflective Co-Evolution Framework for Improving Conversational Evaluation
Evaluating conversational systems in multi-turn settings remains a fundamental challenge. Conventional pipelines typically rely on manually defined rubrics and fixed conversational context$-$a static approach that limits…
Deep Research as Rubric for Reinforcement Learning
Open-ended reasoning and long-form generation tasks lack reliable automatic verification signals for reward-based policy optimization. Rubrics offer a promising alternative, but existing approaches treat them as given ar…
Reinforcement Learning