paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

PaperJury: Due-Process Review for Bounded LaTeX Revision

2026-06-15 · Yiran Wang, Ruixuan An, Biao Wu, Wenhao Wang arxiv

Pre-submission hardening of human-authored LaTeX computer science papers differs from drafting assistance because it requires adversarial whole-paper review, explicit no-fix outcomes, and bounded artifact-safe revision. Existing writing assistants, critique generators, and judge-centered loops lack durable issue identity across rounds, deterministic routing from critique to adjudication, and manuscript control that can reject invalid concerns or defer author-dependent ones. We present PaperJury, a closed-loop review-verdict-revise-verify system built on a deterministic-versus-semantic split: deterministic orchestration manages decomposition, a frozen claim spine, a durable ledger, routing, stopping, and exact-once patch application, while semantic agents are limited to bounded review, judgment, and repair. PaperJury combines bounded holistic review, contestability-based routing, a due-process trial, and risk-proportional guard chains for anchor-bounded edits, yielding terminal outcomes of invalid-drop, valid-fixable, and author-required. In a two-arm expert-review evaluation on held-out Vision, natural language processing, and machine learning papers against four baselines, we assess issue quality, verdict and routing quality, edit safety, convergence behavior, and cost, supporting the thesis that load-bearing safety and completion logic should reside in deterministic orchestration rather than model discretion. PaperJury is available at https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.16322

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Traces

2026-03-30 · Léane Jourdan, Julien Aubert-Béduchaud, Yannis Chupin, Marah Baccari 외 arxiv

Scientific writing is an iterative process that generates rich revision traces, yet publicly available resources typically expose only final or near-final versions of papers. This limits empirical study of revision behav…

PaperDebugger: A Plugin-Based Multi-Agent System for In-Editor Academic Writing, Review, and Editing

2025-12-02 · Junyi Hou, Andre Lin Huikai, Nuo Chen, Yiwei Gong 외 arxiv

Large language models are increasingly embedded into academic writing workflows, yet existing assistants remain external to the editor, preventing deep interaction with document state, structure, and revision history. Th…

Extracting Interlinear Glossed Text from LaTeX Documents

2016-05-01 · LREC 2016 5 · Mathias Schenner, Sebastian Nordhoff

We present texigt, a command-line tool for the extraction of structured linguistic data from LaTeX source documents, and a language resource that has been generated using this tool: a corpus of interlinear glossed text (…

Bibby AI: An Editor-Native Agentic Platform for Academic Research, Writing, and Publishing

2026-07-03 · Nilesh Jain hf

Academic output is produced across a fragmented toolchain: literature discovery in one application, reference management in another, writing in a LaTeX editor, formatting against venue templates by hand, and submission t…

Can we forget how we learned? Doxastic redundancy in iterated belief revision

2024-02-23 · Paolo Liberatore

How information was acquired may become irrelevant. An obvious case is when something is confirmed many times. In terms of iterated belief revision, a specific revision may become irrelevant in presence of others. Simple…