PaRe: A Paper-Reviewer Matching Approach Using a Common Topic Space
Finding the right reviewers to assess the quality of conference submissions is a time consuming process for conference organizers. Given the importance of this step, various automated reviewer-paper matching solutions have been proposed to alleviate the burden. Prior approaches, including bag-of-words models and probabilistic topic models have been inadequate to deal with the vocabulary mismatch and partial topic overlap between a paper submission and the reviewer's expertise. Our approach, the common topic model, jointly models the topics common to the submission and the reviewer's profile while relying on abstract topic vectors. Experiments and insightful evaluations on two datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves consistent improvements compared to available state-of-the-art implementations of paper-reviewer matching.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Topic ModelsSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Chain-of-Factors Paper-Reviewer Matching
With the rapid increase in paper submissions to academic conferences, the need for automated and accurate paper-reviewer matching is more critical than ever. Previous efforts in this area have considered various factors …
Information RetrievalLanguage ModellingRetrievalSemantic Similarity+1Submission-Aware Reviewer Profiling for Reviewer Recommender System
Assigning qualified, unbiased and interested reviewers to paper submissions is vital for maintaining the integrity and quality of the academic publishing system and providing valuable reviews to authors. However, matchin…
Recommendation SystemsEnhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
The increasing volume of papers and proposals that undergo peer review emphasizes the pressing need for greater automation to effectively manage the growing scale. In this study, we present the deployment and evaluation …
AstronomyBeyond Paper-to-Paper: Structured Profiling and Rubric Scoring for Paper-Reviewer Matching
As conference submission volumes continue to grow, accurately recommending suitable reviewers has become a challenge. Most existing methods follow a ``Paper-to-Paper'' matching paradigm, implicitly representing a reviewe…
Match made by BERT? Towards Interpretable Paper-Reviewer Assignments in NLP
Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching. Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached simply as an automa…