paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Pareto-Optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Rankings with a DBN Exposure Model

2022-05-16 · Till Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick Loiseau

In recent years, it has become clear that rankings delivered in many areas need not only be useful to the users but also respect fairness of exposure for the item producers. We consider the problem of finding ranking policies that achieve a Pareto-optimal tradeoff between these two aspects. Several methods were proposed to solve it; for instance a popular one is to use linear programming with a Birkhoff-von Neumann decomposition. These methods, however, are based on a classical Position Based exposure Model (PBM), which assumes independence between the items (hence the exposure only depends on the rank). In many applications, this assumption is unrealistic and the community increasingly moves towards considering other models that include dependences, such as the Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) exposure model. For such models, computing (exact) optimal fair ranking policies remains an open question. We answer this question by leveraging a new geometrical method based on the so-called expohedron proposed recently for the PBM (Kletti et al., WSDM'22). We lay out the structure of a new geometrical object (the DBN-expohedron), and propose for it a Carath\'eodory decomposition algorithm of complexity $O(n^3)$, where $n$ is the number of documents to rank. Such an algorithm enables expressing any feasible expected exposure vector as a distribution over at most $n$ rankings; furthermore we show that we can compute the whole set of Pareto-optimal expected exposure vectors with the same complexity $O(n^3)$. Our work constitutes the first exact algorithm able to efficiently find a Pareto-optimal distribution of rankings. It is applicable to a broad range of fairness notions, including classical notions of meritocratic and demographic fairness. We empirically evaluate our method on the TREC2020 and MSLR datasets and compare it to several baselines in terms of Pareto-optimality and speed.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2205.07647

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

FairnessOpen-Ended Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings

2022-02-07 · Till Kletti, Jean-Michel Renders, Patrick Loiseau

We consider the problem of computing a sequence of rankings that maximizes consumer-side utility while minimizing producer-side individual unfairness of exposure. While prior work has addressed this problem using linear …

Fairness

Towards Efficient Pareto-optimal Utility-Fairness between Groups in Repeated Rankings

2024-02-22 · Phuong Dinh Mai, Duc-Trong Le, Tuan-Anh Hoang, Dung D. Le

In this paper, we tackle the problem of computing a sequence of rankings with the guarantee of the Pareto-optimal balance between (1) maximizing the utility of the consumers and (2) minimizing unfairness between producer…

Fairness

Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Fair

2023-06-21 · Sruthi Gorantla, Anay Mehrotra, Amit Deshpande, Anand Louis

Rankings on online platforms help their end-users find the relevant information -- people, news, media, and products -- quickly. Fair ranking tasks, which ask to rank a set of items to maximize utility subject to satisfy…

FairnessInformation RetrievalPositionRetrieval

Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominance

2021-10-28 · NeurIPS 2021 12 · Virginie Do, Sam Corbett-Davies, Jamal Atif, Nicolas Usunier

We consider the problem of generating rankings that are fair towards both users and item producers in recommender systems. We address both usual recommendation (e.g., of music or movies) and reciprocal recommendation (e.…

FairnessRecommendation SystemsVocal Bursts Valence Prediction

Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in Ranking

2022-06-15 · Yuta Saito, Thorsten Joachims

Rankings have become the primary interface in two-sided online markets. Many have noted that the rankings not only affect the satisfaction of the users (e.g., customers, listeners, employers, travelers), but that the pos…

ArticlesFairness