Parity, Sensitivity, and Transformers
Understanding what neural architectures can and cannot compute is a central challenge in the theory of AI. One of the fundamental problems in this context is the PARITY task, which asks whether the number of 1s in a binary input sequence is even or odd. PARITY is one of the central tasks studied in the theory of computation, yet it remains surprisingly unclear under which conditions transformers can or cannot solve it. In this paper, we show that the minimal number of layers a transformer needs to compute PARITY is two. In particular, we solve the open problem asking whether a one-layer transformer can compute PARITY. We answer it negatively by showing that average sensitivity of a one-layer transformer grows slower than that of PARITY. Furthermore, we show a new construction for transformer that computes PARITY, which improves on the existing constructions by removing a number of impractical assumptions. In particular, the existing transformers for PARITY rely on such impractical assumptions as length-dependent positional encoding, hardmax, layernorm without a regularisation parameter, or incompatibility with causal masking. We show that these assumptions can be removed, at the cost of increasing the number of layers from two to four. Specifically, we show that PARITY can be computed by a four-layer transformer using softmax attention, length-independent and polynomially bounded positional encoding, no layernorm, and compatible with both causal and non-causal masking.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Attention Learning is Needed to Efficiently Learn Parity Function
Transformers, with their attention mechanisms, have emerged as the state-of-the-art architectures of sequential modeling and empirically outperform feed-forward neural networks (FFNNs) across many fields, such as natural…
SensitivityWhy are Sensitive Functions Hard for Transformers?
Empirical studies have identified a range of learnability biases and limitations of transformers, such as a persistent difficulty in learning to compute simple formal languages such as PARITY, and a bias towards low-degr…
SensitivityUnderstanding the Parameter Space Geometry of Transformers Encoding Boolean Functions
Transformers consistently fail to learn certain simple functions that are provably expressible with specific parameter settings. This gap between learnability and expressivity is particularly prominent for sensitive func…
Trapped by simplicity: When Transformers fail to learn from noisy features
Noise is ubiquitous in data used to train large language models, but it is not well understood whether these models are able to correctly generalize to inputs generated without noise. Here, we study noise-robust learning…
Transformers Provably Solve Parity Efficiently with Chain of Thought
This work provides the first theoretical analysis of training transformers to solve complex problems by recursively generating intermediate states, analogous to fine-tuning for chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. We consid…