paper-with-me

Papers

Parity, Sensitivity, and Transformers

2026-02-05 · Alexander Kozachinskiy, Tomasz Steifer, Przemysław Wałȩga arxiv

Understanding what neural architectures can and cannot compute is a central challenge in the theory of AI. One of the fundamental problems in this context is the PARITY task, which asks whether the number of 1s in a binary input sequence is even or odd. PARITY is one of the central tasks studied in the theory of computation, yet it remains surprisingly unclear under which conditions transformers can or cannot solve it. In this paper, we show that the minimal number of layers a transformer needs to compute PARITY is two. In particular, we solve the open problem asking whether a one-layer transformer can compute PARITY. We answer it negatively by showing that average sensitivity of a one-layer transformer grows slower than that of PARITY. Furthermore, we show a new construction for transformer that computes PARITY, which improves on the existing constructions by removing a number of impractical assumptions. In particular, the existing transformers for PARITY rely on such impractical assumptions as length-dependent positional encoding, hardmax, layernorm without a regularisation parameter, or incompatibility with causal masking. We show that these assumptions can be removed, at the cost of increasing the number of layers from two to four. Specifically, we show that PARITY can be computed by a four-layer transformer using softmax attention, length-independent and polynomially bounded positional encoding, no layernorm, and compatible with both causal and non-causal masking.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2602.05896

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Attention Learning is Needed to Efficiently Learn Parity Function

2025-02-11 · Yaomengxi Han, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar

Transformers, with their attention mechanisms, have emerged as the state-of-the-art architectures of sequential modeling and empirically outperform feed-forward neural networks (FFNNs) across many fields, such as natural…

Sensitivity

Why are Sensitive Functions Hard for Transformers?

2024-02-15 · Michael Hahn, Mark Rofin

Empirical studies have identified a range of learnability biases and limitations of transformers, such as a persistent difficulty in learning to compute simple formal languages such as PARITY, and a bias towards low-degr…

Sensitivity

Understanding the Parameter Space Geometry of Transformers Encoding Boolean Functions

2026-06-07 · Blanka Köver, Alexandra Butoi, Anej Svete, Michael Hahn 외 arxiv

Transformers consistently fail to learn certain simple functions that are provably expressible with specific parameter settings. This gap between learnability and expressivity is particularly prominent for sensitive func…

Trapped by simplicity: When Transformers fail to learn from noisy features

2026-02-09 · Evan Peters, Ando Deng, Matheus H. Zambianco, Devin Blankespoor 외 arxiv

Noise is ubiquitous in data used to train large language models, but it is not well understood whether these models are able to correctly generalize to inputs generated without noise. Here, we study noise-robust learning…

Transformers Provably Solve Parity Efficiently with Chain of Thought

2024-10-11 · Juno Kim, Taiji Suzuki

This work provides the first theoretical analysis of training transformers to solve complex problems by recursively generating intermediate states, analogous to fine-tuning for chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. We consid…