paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Partial Identifiability and Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learning

2024-11-24 · Joar Skalse, Alessandro Abate

The aim of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is to infer a reward function $R$ from a policy $\pi$. This problem is difficult, for several reasons. First of all, there are typically multiple reward functions which are compatible with a given policy; this means that the reward function is only *partially identifiable*, and that IRL contains a certain fundamental degree of ambiguity. Secondly, in order to infer $R$ from $\pi$, an IRL algorithm must have a *behavioural model* of how $\pi$ relates to $R$. However, the true relationship between human preferences and human behaviour is very complex, and practically impossible to fully capture with a simple model. This means that the behavioural model in practice will be *misspecified*, which raises the worry that it might lead to unsound inferences if applied to real-world data. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive mathematical analysis of partial identifiability and misspecification in IRL. Specifically, we fully characterise and quantify the ambiguity of the reward function for all of the behavioural models that are most common in the current IRL literature. We also provide necessary and sufficient conditions that describe precisely how the observed demonstrator policy may differ from each of the standard behavioural models before that model leads to faulty inferences about the reward function $R$. In addition to this, we introduce a cohesive framework for reasoning about partial identifiability and misspecification in IRL, together with several formal tools that can be used to easily derive the partial identifiability and misspecification robustness of new IRL models, or analyse other kinds of reward learning algorithms.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2411.15951

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

reinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Partial Identifiability in Inverse Reinforcement Learning For Agents With Non-Exponential Discounting

2024-12-15 · Joar Skalse, Alessandro Abate

The aim of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is to infer an agent's preferences from observing their behaviour. Usually, preferences are modelled as a reward function, $R$, and behaviour is modelled as a policy, $\pi$…

Fast Rates for Inverse Reinforcement Learning

2026-05-14 · Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Maryam Kamgarpour arxiv

We establish novel structural and statistical results for entropy-regularized min-max inverse reinforcement learning (Min-Max-IRL) in finite-horizon MDPs with Borel state and action spaces. We show that maximum likelihoo…

Reinforcement Learning

Learning Utilities from Demonstrations in Markov Decision Processes

2024-09-25 · Filippo Lazzati, Alberto Maria Metelli

Our goal is to extract useful knowledge from demonstrations of behavior in sequential decision-making problems. Although it is well-known that humans commonly engage in risk-sensitive behaviors in the presence of stochas…

Decision MakingSequential Decision Making

InVAErt networks for amortized inference and identifiability analysis of lumped parameter hemodynamic models

2024-08-15 · Guoxiang Grayson Tong, Carlos A. Sing Long, Daniele E. Schiavazzi

Estimation of cardiovascular model parameters from electronic health records (EHR) poses a significant challenge primarily due to lack of identifiability. Structural non-identifiability arises when a manifold in the spac…

Bayesian Inference

Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learning

2022-12-06 · Joar Skalse, Alessandro Abate

The aim of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is to infer a reward function $R$ from a policy $\pi$. To do this, we need a model of how $\pi$ relates to $R$. In the current literature, the most common models are optima…

reinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)